home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!pyrps5.eng.pyramid.com!jmuth
- From: jmuth@pyrps5.eng.pyramid.com (John Muth)
- Newsgroups: misc.invest
- Subject: Re: Index funds
- Message-ID: <185067@pyramid.pyramid.com>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 18:23:54 GMT
- References: <1993Jan18.173918.26154@clipper.ingr.com> <1993Jan18.212330.4527@news.eng.convex.com> <1993Jan20.190354.9575@mobil.com>
- Sender: news@pyramid.pyramid.com
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Pyramid Technology Corporation, Mountain View
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1993Jan20.190354.9575@mobil.com> etpeters@dal.mobil.com (E. T. Peterson(Eric)) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan18.212330.4527@news.eng.convex.com>, Dave Dodson <dodson@convex.COM> writes:
- >
- >|> An index fund always will trail its index
- >|> because the fund has expenses and must retain cash on hand, but the
- >|> index doesn't.
- >
- >A small point:
- >"Cash on hand" will cause the index fund to do better than the index
- >during a year in which the index declines.
-
- I doubt it. An index fund, by definition, attempts to stay fully invested
- in whatever market the index covers. Any cash on hand is so small compared
- to the equities that, even in a declining market, the income from the cash
- won't cover the fund expenses. Therefore the index fund will STILL trail
- the index.
-
- -John Muth
- >
- >*********************************************************************
- >Eric Peterson The sooner you fall behind,
- >Research Geophysicist the more time you'll have to catch up!
- >(214) 951-3251
- >etpeters@dal.mobil.com
- >*********************************************************************
-
-
-