home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / misc / consumer / 22612 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-27  |  1.1 KB
  1. Xref: sparky misc.consumers:22612 rec.autos.driving:7644
  2. Newsgroups: misc.consumers,rec.autos.driving
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!jim!mike
  4. From: mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu (Mike S.)
  5. Subject: Re: Insurance question
  6. Organization: BITS, St. Louis, MO
  7. Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 01:59:50 GMT
  8. Message-ID: <1993Jan28.015950.18610%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu>
  9. References: <wfLKkAK00WBOI22X1A@andrew.cmu.edu> <1715@ncrclm.ClemsonSC.NCR.COM> <1993Jan25.160412.20687%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu> <nj21Hzg06c@atlantis.psu.edu>
  10. Lines: 18
  11.  
  12. >>If given a moving violation with no points, how would this be
  13. >>treated?
  14.  
  15. >In Pennsylvania, this is not possible; all moving violations have points
  16. >asscociated with them.
  17.  
  18. >Are there states out there that do not?
  19.  
  20. Here in wunnerful Missouri, I got a speeding ticket (which does
  21. have the associated points), but when I called the prosecutor to
  22. try to have the charge ammended, he said that the best he could 
  23. do is reduce it to a non-point speeding charge (but still technically
  24. a moving violation).  Apparently, not all counties report non-point
  25. violations to the state (this was in a very rural area).
  26.  
  27. Mike
  28. -- 
  29. mike%jim.uucp@wupost.wustl.edu
  30.