home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.consumers:22451 co.general:2700
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers,co.general
- Path: sparky!uunet!boulder!ucsu!ucsu.Colorado.EDU!fcrary
- From: fcrary@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Frank Crary)
- Subject: Re: Illegal telephone recording
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.182242.4557@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
- Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ucsu.colorado.edu
- Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
- References: <JASON.93Jan21101055@jazz.cnd.hp.com> <1993Jan21.233733.16228@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> <1993Jan22.021011.26809@colorado.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 18:22:42 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1993Jan22.021011.26809@colorado.edu> fedrick@tigger.cs.Colorado.EDU (Kelvin W. Fedrick) writes:
- > Probably, but what if the police just place an ad in a magazine for,
- > oh say child prostitution, and give an address or phone number to
- > call or write to? When the poor fool calls, he is recorded. Then further
- > meetings are set up and at those meetings, they are video taped,
- > recorded, and finally arrested. Entrapment? Evidently not since this
- > happened in Denver not to long ago and some of the individual were
- > convicted according to the news.
-
- As I understand these laws, the idea of the crime can not be initially
- suggested by the government. If the individual had never considered
- child prostitution, never seen an ad on the subject, saw the
- government's ad and became "sold" on the idea; that would be entrapment.
- If, however, the government could show that the same magazine had run
- other, similar ads for child prostitution and/or that the idea had
- already occured to the accused, then it wouldn't be entrapment.
-
- Frank Crary
- CU Boulder
-