home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.consumers:22335 co.general:2673
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers,co.general
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!acheng
- From: acheng@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Albert Cheng)
- Subject: Re: Illegal telephone recording
- References: <1993Jan18.161017.27350@ohmeda.com> <1993Jan18.203601.20459@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> <1993Jan20.172624.9115@netwise.com> <C16Lu9.G9n@panix.com>
- Message-ID: <C17z9q.K96@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Originator: acheng@shalom.ncsa.uiuc.edu
- Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner)
- Organization: Nat'l Ctr for Supercomp App (NCSA) @ University of Illinois
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:53:49 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
-
- In article <C16Lu9.G9n@panix.com>, eck@panix.com (Mark Eckenwiler) writes:
- >In <1993Jan20.172624.9115@netwise.com>, kelvin@netwise.com sez:
- >
- >>As I have said before, you need not tell the other party anything.
- >
- >Your description is only accurate insofar as it summarizes federal
- >law. As Gordon Burditt has pointed out, state law may impose
- >additional restrictions.
-
- What if it is an interstate long distance call? Which state law
- applies?
-