home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!spool.mu.edu!agate!netsys!ukma!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
- From: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu (Rich Winkel)
- Subject: Guatemala: Refugee return update #2
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.221555.7343@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: PACH
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 22:15:55 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 264
-
- /** reg.guatemala: 165.0 **/
- ** Topic: REFUGEE RETURN UPDATE/SYNTHESIS **
- ** Written 3:21 pm Jan 22, 1993 by web:jesuitctr in cdp:reg.guatemala **
- RETURN OF GUATEMALAN REFUGEES FROM MEXICO
- MEDIA UPDATE # 2
-
- January 22, 1993
-
-
- On January 20th, at 9:30 A.M., the 2,400 returning Guatemalan
- refugees who make up the first group departed from the fairground
- area in Comitan, the Kastalya, and the camp "Gracias a Dios" in 70
- buses and began the journey home. The caravan was approximately 10
- kilometers long, and included 30 vehicles of the accompaniers.
- Accompanying the refugees were representatives of the Guatemalan
- and Mexican refugee commissions (CEAR and COMAR respectively), the
- Mexican Red Cross, and the Federal Highway Police. In the lead car
- were Alfredo Witschi (UNHCR), Philip Anderson of the International
- Consultation and Support Group (GRICAR), Mons. Samuel Ruiz, Bishop
- of San Cristobal de las Casas, and a representative of the
- Permanent Commissions.
-
- When the refugees crossed the border at midday they were met
- by Nobel Peace prize winner Rigoberta Menchu and Mons. Avila de
- Aguila, President of the Mediating Commission (between the refugees
- and the Guatemalan government). Ms. Menchu was accompanied to the
- border by the Canadian Ambassador to Guatemala, Brian Dickson, and
- two Canadian MPs, Dan Heap (NDP) and Beryl Gaffney (Liberal).
-
- Also present were members of various NGOs as well as fellow
- Guatemalans, who welcomed the refugees with marimbas (traditional
- Guatemalan instrument) and other forms of and music. Almost
- immediately they set out for Huehuetenango, and the CEAR's
- reception centre, two more hours of a journey. There they were to
- receive their documentation, including cards for temporary
- exemption from military service, as well as for medical assistance
- and credit (see below for more details of the actual arrival at the
- border).
-
- Observers and sources close to the Permanent Commissions agree
- that the crossing is the direct result of the persistence of the
- refugees themselves. The Permanent Commissions earlier in the month
- had felt great pressure to delay the date of the return until after
- January 13th. However, according to the Commissions themselves, the
- refugees insisted in their general assemblies that they were not
- going to wait any longer. It was the refugees who stimulated their
- representatives in the Commissions to redouble their efforts and
- keep moving forward, even when negotiations with the government
- were quite tense and delicate.
-
- The Reception Centre at Huehuetenango: Reported Problems
-
- The first day of the return was not without its problems,
- prompting criticism of the Guatemalan government by the Permanent
- Commissions. Even though hundreds of people came from many
- different parts of Guatemala and other countries to attend the
- arrival of the caravan in Huehuetenango, the Permanent Commissions
- claim that CEAR did not permit those waiting to welcome the
- refugees to do so, although it had been approved and planned. For
- example, the Guatemalan police diverted traffic, which effectively
- cancelled religious and cultural celebrations that had been planned
- by various groups in Huehuetenango.
-
- The Permanent Commissions were also critical that the majority
- of the returnees were given military blankets and tents in which to
- sleep. The people, though, refused to use them, and since CEAR had
- not made any other arrangements they were forced to improvise by
- constructing tents of nylon. At 9:00 pm, many families still had no
- place to sleep.
-
- In contravention of the agreement between the government and
- the refugees, CEAR officials prevented the refugees from leaving
- and returning to the reception centre, claiming that the refugees
- were undocumented. The Permanent Commissions stated: "The returnees
- needed to be able to move around in order to obtain on their own
- the necessary materials for sleeping, because CEAR didn't provide
- them." Also, CEAR officials did not allow the internationals
- accompanying the refugees to sleep in the same centre as the
- refugees, nor did they give them any food.
-
- Perhaps foreshadowing problems to come, the government also
- stated, through a communique released on January 20th by the
- Guatemalan Embassy in Mexico, that the responsibility for the
- health, food, transport, water and other logistics for the return
- of the thousands of refugees is the responsibility of the UNHCR,
- given that they had chosen the "long route" to Poligono 14.
-
-
- The Situation of the Refugees
-
- While the Permanent Commissions said that there have been
- cases of flu and diarrhea due to fatigue, the cold, travel, and the
- lack of medical attention, no one has fallen gravely ill nor has it
- been necessary to hospitalize anyone. To date, two children have
- been born and both are in good health. Doctors of the Red Cross
- report that 60 women are in the final weeks of pregnancy.
-
- In a statement by the office of the United Nations High
- Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), it was announced that in
- Poligono 14 there is land assured for 250 families. The rest of the
- refugees will stay there temporarily until the question of where
- they will finally resettle is resolved. During this time, the UNHCR
- further stated, the refugees will receive help from NGOs, which
- will provide food and economic assistance.
-
- Reports about the conditions awaiting the refugees at Poligono
- 14 have raised concerns among those supporting the refugees. There
- are only two structures built with tin and wooden poles, there is
- no drinking water, no basic services, and only three latrines. And
- the most delicate issue is that there is no road on which vehicles
- might reach the site. CEAR announced that the Guatemalan government
- would provide $4 million to make in improvements to the area.
-
- Also of concern is that nearby to the return site is a
- military base with approximately 180 soldiers, whose function is to
- organize patrol units in the zone. One local farmer interviewed in
- Poligono 14 expressed his support for the refugees' return, but
- claimed that the army is telling the local people that guerrillas
- are coming along with the refugees.
-
- Meanwhile, the Guatemalan embassy in Mexico reported that the
- government would sign an agreement with the Permanent Commissions
- to demilitarize the Poligono 14 zone. However, the Permanent
- Commissions stated that they had no knowledge of this and confirmed
- that there is a "significant military presence" in the area of the
- new settlements for the refugees.
-
-
- Support and Accompaniment
-
- The UNHCR regional representative, Caesar Witschi, indicated
- that the UNHCR will remain for one year in the resettlement areas
- in order to guarantee the fulfillment of the agreement between the
- Permanent Commissions and the government. He also announced that
- the UNHCR has budgeted $2.3 million dollars to repatriate 14,000
- refugees this year from the camps in Campeche, Chiapas and Quintana
- Roo.
-
- According to the Permanent Commissions, during a meeting on
- January 18th, the Guatemalan government finally accepted the
- refugees' demand that the internationals accompanying them be able
- to travel with them on the same buses. The refugees will have as
- accompaniers 78 Guatemalans and a group of 107 international
- observers from countries such as Germany, USA, Spain, Canada and
- Holland. However, it appears that only about sixty to seventy of
- these international volunteers will go on to Poligono 14 and
- actually work with the people as they resettle.
-
- The NGOs accompanying the refugees see their task as one of
- observing the entire process, from the time the refugees leave
- Mexico until they arrive at their final destinations, in order to
- report whatever anomalies that might occur and threaten the smooth
- functioning of the return and/or the rights and security of the
- refugees.
-
-
- The Schedule for the Remainder of the Refugees' Return
-
- The following is the refugees' planned itinerary from
- Huehuetenango to Poligono 14:
-
- 22/01/93 - Friday: (In Huehuetenango)
-
- 23/01/93 - Saturday:
- Leave Huehuetenango: 6:00 am
- KM 187 (rest stop) 9:00 am
- Cuatro Caminos (reception ceremony) 10:30 am
- Solola (welcome celebrations in route)
- Los Encuentros (welcome celebrations in route)
- Chimaltenango (dinner) 4:00 pm
- (Transit Police presence)
- Leave for Guatemala City: 5:00 pm
- Arrive in Guatemala City: 6:00 pm
-
- The caravan will be divided in three parts with accompaniment by
- the Transit Police and will go to different reception centers:
- 1. Liceo Guatemala
- 2. Instituto Indigena Santiago
- 3. Liceo Javier
-
- 24/01/93 - Sunday: Rest Day
-
- 25/01/93 - Monday:
- Leave Guatemala City: 7:00 am
- Meeting of the three caravans after the
- Belize bridge (Transit Police presence) 7:30 am
- Arrival El Rancho (Transit Police presence) 12:30 pm
- Arrival in Coban: 5:00 pm
- Reception Centers: 1. El Calvario
- 2. San Marcos Parish
- 3. Nazarene Church
- 4. INJAV
- 5. Parish convent
- 6. Evangelical Centers
-
- 26/01/93 - Tuesday:
- Leave Coban: 5:00 am
- Arrival in Chisec: 5:00 pm
- (After this date, one caravan
- will leave each day with approximately
- 400 persons, roughly corresponding to
- 10 busses.)
-
- 27/01/93 - Wednesday:
- Leave Chisec: 5:00 am
- Arrival in Cantabal: 5:00 pm
- Activities: Thanksgiving Mass
- Dinner and reception
-
- 28/01/93 - Thursday
- Leave Cantabal: 7:00 am
- Arrival in Poligono 14: 1:00 pm
-
-
- Concluding Comments
-
- Observers of the return feel that the government of President
- Serrano wants to take advantage of the repatriation in order to
- undo the isolation of his government within the international
- community. President Serrano insists that things inside Guatemala
- have changed, and that is why the refugees are returning. But the
- refugees, especially after such a long and difficult process of
- negotiations simply to obtain the right to return to their country
- when and where they choose, certainly do not believe that things
- have changed in Guatemala.
-
- NGOs and others supporting the refugees continue to call for
- international vigilance, especially in these days of the first
- return. Of particular concern after the first day is the violation
- of the refugees' right to freedom of movement and the unwillingness
- of the Guatemalan government to guarantee everything necessary for
- the well-being of the returnees. According to these sources, the
- necessary documentation for the return was taken care of in
- Comitan, Mexico, in order to avoid any delays once the refugees
- crossed the border. So there seems little justification for
- curtailing the refugees's movement.
-
- Finally, there is ongoing preoccupation with the role of both
- the UNHCR and the government of Guatemala. NGOs continue to call
- for pressure to be brought to bear on the government to take
- responsibility for the safety of the refugees. In particular, they
- are insisting that the government exercise this responsibility
- through civilian institutions in Guatemala, and not through the
- Guatemalan army, which they claim should play no role at all in the
- return, given that the refugees are civilians. Moreover, they
- maintain that the government of Guatemala should be asked to
- publicly guarantee the civil and human rights of the refugee
- population.
-
- As for the UNHCR, NGOs insist that it should be pressured to
- comply with its mandate and give the logistical support needed in
- the future returns. Already, the Permanent Commissions report that
- about 8,000 people have indicated a desire to be part of the second
- caravan, whose date will be established in the middle of February.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- - 30 -
-
- Prepared by the Jesuit Centre for Social Faith and Justice,
- Toronto, based on information received from humanitarian sources in
- Mexico and Guatemala monitoring the return. For more information
- please call Laurel Whitney or Ted Hyland. Tel: (416) 469-1123. Fax
- ** End of text from cdp:reg.guatemala **
-
-