home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!gatech!ukma!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!rich
- From: Hank Roth <pnews@igc.apc.org>
- Subject: PLP on SANDERO (1)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.213722.6313@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: rich@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: ?
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 21:37:22 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 346
-
- /* Written 10:09 pm Jan 23, 1993 by pnews@igc.apc.org in igc:p.news */
- /* ---------- "PLP on SANDERO (1)" ---------- */
- <<< via P_news/p.nes >>>
- {From THE COMMUNIST, the political journal of the Progressive
- Labor Party, Number 6/Fall/1992}
-
- [I am presenting this article, by the PLP, on Sandero Luminoso,
- for informational purposes. It contains an accurate picture of
- life in Peru and provides, in my opinion, a better understanding
- of how different politics happens in the Third World. Be aware
- also that theory and practice tend to converge at first, but
- then they diverge from orthodox analysis and practice due to those
- exigencies that are caused by circumstance which are particularly
- peculiar to Latin America and specifically to Peru.
-
- The article is naturally critical of Sandero because of a
- difference in political analysis and process between the PLP and
- the SL, and anyone reading this material should bare that in
- mind. This article should thus be read with a certain objective
- `truth seeking' detachment and a degree of skepticism, no less so
- than reports coming in from various amnesty groups and other
- tendencies with a possible ax to grind, and in that respect this
- reading and further reading from other sources should [can]
- present a totality that will be closer to the truth.---Hank Roth]
-
- Part 1 (of 4)
-
- PERU'S TARNISHED PATH
-
- "How's business?"
- "It's dead."
-
- Since 1980 this has perfectly described all of Latin America's
- traditional export-based capitalist economics. It is why Latin
- American economists call this the "dead time."
-
- Nowhere is it deader than in Peru. Between 1988 and 1991 total
- Peruvian economic output shrank 30%. By 1991 traditional exports
- had fallen to one third what they were worth in 1975. Workers'
- living conditions were cut in half. The political system
- shriveled with the economy, as the main parties, each
- representing a different faction of property, failed to figure
- out how to get the world market to accept its commodities. Even
- the traditinal "Left" tried. Bankrupt ideas, bankrupt economy--
- they go hand in hand.
-
- But it is not true that capitalism doesn't work at all in Peru.
- Only traditional capitalism is in crisis. The capitalists are
- able to make one part of their system work--the cocaine business.
- They just don't like to talk about it. But cocaine is Peru's
- largest industry. Roughly 15% of the entire Peruvian workforce is
- employed in the coca trade. [Andreas and Sharpe, COCAINE POLITICS
- IN THE ANDES, in CURRENT HISTORY mag., February 1992, pg 77] Coca
- paste accounts for anywhere from 33% to 70% of the country's total
- exports (extimates of the value of this illegal export naturally
- vary.) [Phillip Smith, GRAPPLING WITH SHINING PATH, in NEW
- POLITICS, Dec. 1991, pg 95] Drug trade dollars finance Peru's
- imports. [U.S. Department of Commerce, PERU, U.S. Government
- Document 1234C, 1991, pg 12] Drug trade dollars are soaked up by
- the Peruvian Central Bank and the rest of the government owned
- banking system to the tune of up to US$4.7 billion per year, and
- are used by the government to service the country's US$21 billion
- foreign debt (principally to pay USA banks) [Andreas and Sharpe,
- IBID, page 78].
-
- Imagine what it must be like to be a worker forced to earn a
- living in Peru. If you are not a farm worker or a miner you have
- to live in Lima. That is where the capitalists have put the jobs.
- Nearly everything manufactured in Peru is produced in Lima. Lima
- is also the national capital and most of the white collar jobs
- are located there as well. So Lima is bursting at the seams. From
- a population of just under 230,000 in 1920, Lima mushroomed to
- 2.4 million by 1964. But that is nothing. In the next 25 years
- the business system forced another nearly 5.5 million working
- people to move to Lima to try to earn a living.
-
- Today nearly EIGHT MILLION (almost all desperately poor workers)
- are jammed into Lima and more keep arriving every day in a search
- for paid work. They are forced to live in a series of
- shantytowns, each of several hundred thousand population, thrown
- up on garbage dumps, or on any bit of vacant land they can seize.
- There is no housing, no schools, no sewers, no public transport,
- no garbage collection, no electricity, no indoor plumbing, and --
- - because Lima is in the middle of a desert --- no water. And, of
- course, despite the workers' needs and hopes, there are no jobs.
- Unemployment and underemployment for Peru as a whole is over 90%
-
- Lima's poor cannot even afford charity. A typical network of soup
- kitchens in one shantytown (called Villa El Salvador) gets its
- food from U.S., Spanish, Canadian and Italian "aid" agencies.
- Despite the fact that it gets free food, the soup kitchen network
- scandalously and outrageously charges 30 cents a meal. This may
- seem cheap, but it isn't. The network's manager told the NEW YORK
- TIMES, "Eating in a soup kitchen is becoming a luxury. About 65
- percent of Villa's population [which is 320,000] eat in soup
- kitchens. A lot of the rest can't afford it." [NEW YORK TIMES,
- April 15, 1992, pg 12]
-
- Still, all things considered, living in Lima is better than
- living anywhere else in Peru. That is why, outside of Lima, Peru
- is pretty sparsely populated. Eight million are crammed into
- Lima. Thirteen million are spread throughout the rest of this
- immense area. [Peru is pretty big. It is as big as all of Mexico
- from the Rio Grande to below Mexico City (an area in which 52
- million people live). It is as big as Belgium, the Netherlands,
- France, Italy and Germany combined (where 213 million people
- live.) It is as big as all the eastern states of the USA from
- Maine to Florida put together, with West Virgina and Tennessee
- thrown in (where 96 million live). It is as big as the West Coast
- of the USA---Washington, Oregon and California, with half of
- Arizona added (an area where 35 million live.)
-
- Living on the coast (where Spanish-speaking, mostly mestizo
- workers live, as do black and Chinese workers) is easier than
- living in the Andean highlands (where mostly Quechua-speaking
- Indian workers live.) The coastal metizo workers are paid seven
- times more than the highland Indian workers. The Indian workers
- can expect to be dead by the time they are 45; the mestizo
- workers live a little longer.
-
- If you were forced to earn a living in Peru, you would be trapped
- in a racist capitalist system which over the years has been
- dominated by one social class---spanish speaking, European-
- cultured, white, Lima-based owners of huge country estates,
- descendants of the 16th-century Spanish conquerors. This class
- was dominated first by Spain's rulers, then by English bankers
- and finally by U.S. bankers (Italian and Japnese bankers playing
- a smaller part up to now.)
-
- The Peruvian ruling class made its money by enslaving workers in
- a racist system and playing ball with the international bankers.
- If the bankers wanted to lend money to develop phosphate, rubber,
- cotton or copper exports, the Peruvian rulers obligingly borrowed
- the money and had their workers expand phosphate, rubber, cotton
- or copper production until the bottom fell out of these markets.
- (This had no connection with the needs of Peru's working people.
- For example, these huge farm-owners always imported food since it
- was more profitable for them to grow cotton for export than to
- grow food to eat. This raised the price of food sky high, but
- that didn't bother the land-owners---they could afford it. Only
- the farm workers starved.) When the bankers wanted to lend money
- tou build unnecessary railroads, the Peruvian rulers borrowed the
- money and their workers built railroads to nowhere. (But no road
- or rail system adequate for the Peruvian working people's needs
- for transport and communications was ever built.) It was in this
- way, by borrowing for projects whose only benefit was the profits
- they produced for the elite, that the government built up a US$21
- billion foreign debt.
-
- In view of the U.S. government, "It is a fact of life that...the
- country is on the edge of disaster." [U.S. Department of
- Commerce, IBID, pg 11] Are they kidding? The Peruvian working
- people have long been buried in disaster. But it is the business
- class, not the working class, that is the U.S. government's
- concern. The "disaster" the U.S. government is worried about is
- communism. What the U.S. officials mean is that if the breakdown
- of traditional capitalism alone could produce a communist
- revolution, there would be one in Peru.
-
- But as it happens, a communist revolution requires communists.
- That doesn't mean anyone who chooses to call himself or herself a
- communist. It means Marxist-Leninists organized in a party with
- correct ideas of what communism is and of how working people can
- transform their ideiology and take steps to reorganze their
- society from capitalist to communist. Is there such a party, with
- such a line, in Peru? (Communists are not like Christian
- evangelists, who can promise anything they want in heaven. The
- evangelists will never be tested. No one will ever be able to
- prove they are wrong. But communists who win power have about
- twenty years to make good on their plans. If you do the worng
- things, a new exploitative class structure emerges, and you are
- back to square one.)
-
- A BRIEF HISTORY OF SHINING PATH
-
- Now, since May 17, 1980 there has been an armed revolt in Peru led
- by an organization calling itself the Communist Party of Peru,
- but knwn more popularly as the Sandero Luminoso, or SHINING PATH.
- [SANDERO LUMINOSO--Spanish for SHINING PATH---is the name the
- bourgeois press hung on the Communist Party of Peru (CPP) to
- distinguish it from other Peruvian organizations also using the
- name "Communist Party." The name's origin is from a CPP slogan:
- "Follow the SHINING PATH of Mariategui." This is to honor Jose
- Carlos Mariategui for being the founder of Peru's communist
- movement. He died in 1930.] SHINING PATH claims it now rules
- "liberated areas" in which 30% of the Peruvian people live.
- [Comments by representatives fo the CPP leadership at a meeting
- with a PLP delegation in February, 1992] This achievement cost
- some 24,000 lives (most murdered in cold blood by the reactionary
- government army and its death squads.)
-
- The SHINING PATH originated in 1959, when a group of young
- professors teaching at the university in the southern mountain
- city of Ayacucho joined the Peruvian Communist Party's regional
- committee. One of them, Abimael Guzman Reynoso (SHINING PATH's
- future "President Gonzalo"), a philosophy professor, and later
- Dean of the Faculty, became chairman of the Party regional
- committee. Guzman soon formed a secret group within the Party,
- which called itself the "Red Faction."
-
- In 1964 the Peruvaian party split, with a smaller group
- (including the leadership, which historically had close ties with
- the Communist Party of the U.S.) supporting the Soviet party, and
- the larger part supporting the Chinese. The "Red Faction" allied
- with the pro-China party.
-
- Guzman spent most of 1965 in China studying the Chinese Communist
- Party's then current political line and military tactics,
- returning to Peru determined to carry out this strategy.
-
- Within a few years the "Red Faction" had secured a base in the
- student federation and among the faculty in Ayacucho. It helped
- organzie an Ayacucho municipal federation of communtity
- organizations and helped lead a massive regional movement against
- government plans to eliminate free education.
-
- In 1970 (Guzman was in jail at the time) the pro-China party was
- convulsed by an inner-party struggle (in part over the qustion of
- whether or not a "revolutionary situation" existed in Peru), and
- as part of this struggle, Guzman and his "Red Faction" were
- expelled. When Guzman got out of jail later in 1970, the "Red
- Faction," which held that there was a "revolutionary situation,"
- decided to transform itself into the "Communist Party of Peru."
- The membership (which was, and remains, secret) was made up
- mainly of professors and students at the Ayacucho university.
-
- The new party spent its first five years working out a systematic
- ideological and political line (a line identical to what Guzman
- was taught in China in 1965), training its members in this line,
- and trying to develop a base of support. Guzman's plan was to
- hold a party congress in 1978, at which the call to start the
- "people's war" would be issued. But despite everything, a
- significant part of the party's members and leaders---apparently
- the majority---disagreed with the idea of armed struggle. A
- congress to initiate armed struggle could not be organized. So
- Guzman decided to start the armed struggle first, and then hold
- the congress (finally held ten years later.)
-
- "This [situation] let us in 1978 to postpone the congress
- in order to carry it out when we would be amidst the people's
- war. Our reasoning was plain and simple: being in war, who could
- oppose the people's war? A congress and a party with arms in
- hand, with a vigorous people's war, how could there be anyone who
- would oppose the development of the people's war? They would not
- be able to generate any harm for us any more." [Abimael Guzman,
- "President Gonzolo Breaks the Silence: An Interview From the
- Underground," EL DIARIO, Lima, July 24, 1988, reprinted by Red
- Banner Editorial House, pg 39. This document was given to a PLP
- delegation in February, 1992 by representatives of the CPP
- leadership as an authoritative document of the CPP. The account
- of SHINING PATH's history given here is based on this interveiw.]
-
- For the next two years the small party fought over the question
- of armed struggle. At a Central Committee meeting late in 1979
- Guzman was able to expel from the party most of those who opposed
- starting the armed struggle. At a followup meeting in February,
- 1980 the remainder of the opposition was expelled. "We had to
- prune the Central Committee itself strongly." [Guzman, IBID, pg 66]
-
- That done, concrete plans were made for the first actions. On May
- 17, 1980, the day before the first national presidential
- elections in 17 years, a group of young people broke into the
- town hall in the mountain town of Chuschi, about thirty miles
- southwest of Ayachuchco, took the ballots and voting lists to the
- town plaza, and publicly burned them. This was the first "armed
- action" by the first of the party's "armed detachment." Dynamite
- bombs were set off in the following weeks in other palces. The
- "people's war" had begun.
-
- In Peru in 1980 the civilian government did not trust the army.
- (A 12 year military dictatorship had just ended.) For its part,
- the army command was completely demoralized. As a result, the
- army could not be called out against the SHINING PATH. The
- SHINING PATH was left alone by the army from May, 1980 until the
- end of 1982. Militarily the SHINING PATH had only the local
- police forces to contend with. For more than two years SHINING
- PATH armed detachments were relatively free to spread north and
- south to villages throughout the southern mountains to destroy
- police outposts and chase away the police and the local political
- bosses, replace them with secret "People's Committees," capture
- weapons, and recruit.
-
- "We generated a void in the countryside and we had to
- establish a New Power without having defeated larger armed forces
- because they had not taken part, and if they did, if they
- participated, it was because we had established the People's
- Power. [Guzman, IBID, pg 55]
-
- By December, 1982 the national government's fear of the rebels
- was finally greater than its fear of its own army, and the army
- was sent in.
-
- The army's plan was simple: kill the SHINING PATH and reestablish
- the old structures of power by terrorizing the local populations,
- killing indiscriminately, expelling people from their villages
- (to make it impossible for SHINING PATH to organize) and forcing
- peasants into anti-SHINING PATH paramilitary groups (called, in
- Peru, "rondos.")
-
- SHINING PATH's leadership met in early 1983 and decided to defend
- their "New Power" against the army's campaign in two ways. First,
- by reorganizing their armed detachements into a centrally-led
- "People's Guerrilla Army." Second, by organizationally grouping
- the secret village "People's Committees" in each area to form
- "base areas."
-
- Revolutionaries need base areas to rest in, grow their food,
- train and recruit. They need places that are secure and stable.
- Otherwise these places are not base areas. A base area can be
- secure only if and when the local population supports the
- revolution and enters into it. It can be stable only if and when
- the government army is unable to enter and occupy the territory
- of the base area. This means the revolutionary armed forces are
- big enough, experienced enough and powerful enough to fight and
- win in positional warfare. (Hit-and-run sneak attacks are not
- good enough; it is the enemy who has to run away.) A base area
- therefore starts out insecure and unstable, and gets transformed
- over time, through political work and fighting. But the whole
- process is impossible unless the revolutionaries have already
- achieved a certain military strength.
-
- Whether or not the SHINING PATH leadership felt it was militarily
- strong enough to take on the army (their forces had no actual
- combat experience), they were convinced they had no other choice.
- They had already "created the void," and filled it with their
- organization. They had crated embryonic base areas. What choice
- but to try to defend them? And if they were defended
- successfully, then they had to be developed.
-
- "A highly bloody and merciless genocide took place. We
- responded by fighting fiercely. The reaction, and concretely, the
- armed forces, believed that by 1984 they had already defeated us.
- I refer to [their] documents...where it even said we were not a
- danger anymore...But what was the result? That the People's
- Committees and the base areas multiplied themselves, and that led
- us. Later on, to develop the base areas." [Guzman, IBID, pg 57]
-
- By the end of 1984 the SHINING PATH claimed to have a larger
- army, more "People's Commitees," more base areas and a larger
- party. For its part, the army extended military rule over 40% of
- the country and continued a merciless reign of terror, torture
- and assassination against any suspects it could get its hands on.
-
- <continued in Part 2>
-
-
-