home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!cs.uoregon.edu!nntpserver!mike
- From: mike@mystix.cs.uoregon.edu (Michael John Haertel)
- Subject: harmful effects of gnu software
- Message-ID: <MIKE.93Jan23142230@mystix.cs.uoregon.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.uoregon.edu (Netnews Owner)
- Organization: CS Dept, University of Oregon
- Distribution: gnu
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 22:22:30 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- One claim that many proponents of the 'gnu considered harmful' theory
- are making is that the existence of the gnu software harms innovation.
- The line of argument seems to be as follows:
-
- Given a choice between an adequate free product and an excellent
- commercial product, users will nearly always choose the free product
- even though it may not fully meet their needs. Gnu software is
- flooding the marketplace with adequate free products, and therefore
- people who wish to develop better proprietary products will not be
- able to make a living. Thus Gnu software kills innovation.
-
- The fallacy of this argument is obvious. The argument claims that gnu
- software harms innovation, since in the absence of gnu software better
- products would edge out the poorer ones. The history of the proprietary
- software industry shows that nothing is farther from the truth: the
- success of a product has little to do with its technical merit, and a
- lot to do with marketing and "standardization". The ultimate example
- is MS-DOS: early 60's OS technology at best, yet still millions of
- copies are sold.
-
- As a counterclaim, I would like to suggest that making adequate free
- software available is a good way to help force entrenched obsolete
- software out of the marketplace, and therefore the gnu project may
- help improve software diversity.
-