home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-ulm.de!faw.uni-ulm.de!walrath
- From: walrath@faw.uni-ulm.de (Wayne K. Walrath)
- Subject: Re: Shareware summary (long)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.142321.16278@wega.rz.uni-ulm.de>
- Sender: news@wega.rz.uni-ulm.de (News Net)
- Organization: FAW (Research Institute For Applied Knowledge Processing, Ulm, Germany)
- References: <C10BHr.E15@news.udel.edu> <PETE.93Jan17213434@tatjana.rice.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:23:21 GMT
- Lines: 58
-
- In article <PETE.93Jan17213434@tatjana.rice.edu>, pete@tatjana.rice.edu (Louis Wu) writes:
- |
- |> Still, there are more honest people out there than I had originally
- |> thought. I've made enough to pay for my computer, which I certainly never
- |> expected in the beginning. My checks have probably come half from the
- |> states, half from elsewhere. Of the elsewhere, Australia sent the most. But
- |> I've also had checks from Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany,
- |> Holland, Japan, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland.
-
- It would seem not such a bad idea to have an option for people
- to pay their shareware fees closer to their home (country). For example,
- let's say that a Belgium-based company/person
- receives all payments from users in Europe
- who want to register their program (necessitating of course, that shareware
- authors have designated this company/person to be a legitimate (spelling?)
- recipient for that program's fees), then periodically this C/P takes off
- a pre-arranged commission for the service, then converts
- and transfers all the money going to the States (as well as all
- money destined for New Zealand, etc.), splits the cost of doing
- this proportionately among the recipients in that country, takes
- off their commission for the service (which could be
- a small added cost that the users should be requested to
- pay---as in, send me $x or else pay $x+2 to so-and-so in Belgium).
-
- The initial problems I see with this are the following: 1) trusting the
- agent (because contracts and trying to sue people across borders is
- probably not worth it for the amounts involved--if you are receiving so
- much from your programs than maybe you are ready to go commercial);
- and 2) if the Author has promised something to those who register (disks,
- numbers to unlock features/stop showing splash screen, etc.), then they
- would need to get the information at regular, and timely intervals from the
- agent.
-
- It would definately add a new layer of organization and headaches to
- what is supposed to be a streamlined, simple concept (the shareware concept,
- I mean, for those of you not paying attention... ;-) ), but on
- the other hand, it is already more complicated for users to pay their fees
- to authors living in other countries.
-
- Anyone care to add to these thoughts, or if someone knows about
- organizations already established for this purpose, I would enjoy
- hearing how they are working. So far, I have never seen a program that
- mentioned such an organization.
-
-
-
- |>
- |> --
- |> =============================================================================
- |> Pete Keleher "Relax! Don't worry! Have a homebrew!" pete@cs.rice.edu
- |> =============================================================================
- |>
-
- -wayne / Wayne K. Walrath \
- / walrath@faw.uni-ulm.de \
- \ The Rsrch. Institute for Applied /
- \ Knowledge Processing & AI-Ulm, Germany /
-
-