home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!portal!danb
- From: danb@shell.portal.com (Dan E Babcock)
- Subject: Re: local bus hard disk
- Message-ID: <C1E0A1.HIq@unix.portal.com>
- Sender: news@unix.portal.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: jobe
- Organization: Portal Communications Company -- 408/973-9111 (voice) 408/973-8091 (data)
- References: <1993Jan23.231824.24755@rose.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 02:01:13 GMT
- Lines: 34
-
- In article <1993Jan23.231824.24755@rose.com> gyl.midroni@rose.com (gyl midroni) writes:
- >
- >Date Entered: 01-23-93 18:08
- >C(>
- >C(> >Didn't he say it was a VL card? That means that the CPU can't do
- >C(> >anything anyway, since when the disk controller has the local bus the
- >C(> >CPU can't talk to memory or anything anyway. This is why I don't see
- >C(> >VL as a real win for anything except perhaps video; it will give you
- >C(> >great burst mode numbers, but it impacts overall system performance to
- >C(> >do that.
- >C(>
- >C(> Hmmm, it still has the internal I/D cache to run out of.
- >
- > Could you explain this to me a little slower please? I am about
- >to plunk down big bucks on a new system. This particular vendor
- >offers local bus hard disk controller. He says the bus is 100% VESA
- >compatible.
- > It seems to me that local bus disk access will be a speed booster
- >for the reason of faster data communicatio with the CPU / memory. It
- >is four times faster to get data off the disk at 33 MHz off the local
- >bus connection to the CPU and memory than at 8 MHz via the ISA bus.
- >As simple as that... no? Why would this impact system performance
- >any more than getting data off the ISA bus.
-
- First of all, bus master DMA on the ISA bus (which is a local bus, just
- for the 286 instead of the 486) _will_ prevent the CPU from accessing
- main memory. The big deal about having a faster bus is that on a hard
- drive transfer (for example) instead of the CPU grinding to a halt
- (because the bus is being used to capacity) it may still run at
- 80% of peak performance. This is a big deal if you're using a
- multitasking OS like OS/2 or whatever.
-
- Dan
-
-