home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:36821 comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard:7157 news.groups:26064
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.soundcard,news.groups
- Path: sparky!uunet!enterpoop.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!dmsilev
- From: dmsilev@athena.mit.edu (Daniel M Silevitch)
- Subject: Re: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.124855.4289@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: w20-575-70.mit.edu
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- References: <1993Jan21.131523.10196@spider.co.uk> <1993Jan21.141858.24970@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <93021.123116SRK106@psuvm.psu.edu> <1jmrn2INN9ck@fido.asd.sgi.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 12:48:55 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1jmrn2INN9ck@fido.asd.sgi.com>, autry@sgi.com (Larry Autry) writes:
- |> In article <93021.123116SRK106@psuvm.psu.edu> SRK106@psuvm.psu.edu (Senthil Ramas Kumar) writes:
- |> >
- |> >I very much agree with you that the term "x86", does not lend it nicely to
- |> >suit the description that we are looking for. Further, as a previous poster
- |> >had pointed out its a little technical in nature, and it _could_ be obscure
- |> >to people, especially those who are new to the area of interest.
- |> >
- |> >but, I somehow feel that just keeping "pc" instead of "ibm.pc" is too
- |> >generic, and can be very confusing to people.
- |> >
- |> >Kumar
- |> What about comp.sys.intel.*. Is there something wrong with that?
- |>
- |> --
- |> Larry Autry
- |> Silicon Graphics, St. Louis
- |> autry@sgi.com
-
- What about pc clones using AMD 386 and 486 processors? ibm.pc, or perhaps
- ibm.pc-clone is better.
-
- Daniel Silevitch dmsilev@athena.mit.edu
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
-