Fujitsu suggested not only removing the terminator on the drive (not indicated
in the documentation that comes with it), the strap for synchronous SCSI,
and a the strap on CNH1 pins 23-24, which has something to do with terminator
power source. Whichever of these was most important, I don't know, but
the drive now is recognized, and is in use without errors logged.
I did get a few responses, mostly about SCSI itself, rather than the
particular drive. Each was responded to individually. I have left the
drive strapped to SCSI-1, also - after all of the changes, I don't know
if setting to SCSI-2 would also work. As long as the drive is smaller than
1 GB, I believe there is no problem - I think SCSI-1 doesn't address higher
block numbers.
In article <1jp4j7INNbal@shelley.u.washington.edu> bolson@carson.u.washington.edu (Edward Bolson) writes:
>I also have a new 4000/90, and bought a Fujitsu drive recommended by R-squared
>as a replacement for an RZ-25. Am home at the moment, but believe it is a 2624FA.
>Anyway, it was intended to be mounted internally, and I have been waiting for
>the mounting plate, which they seem unable to supply. However, I tried leaving the device "loose" and attaching the cables, and it won't pass the SCSI self
>test in the 4000/90, nor will the system boot (remote boot) with the drive
>attached. I have tried this with and without terminators attached. None of
>DEC's documentation indicates whether or not to leave terminators on an internal
>drive.
>
>I am talking to one tech support person, and I am beginning to feel like I
>need to call in DEC. Maybe the disk is faulty. Any advice?
>
>Ed
>
>--
>Ed Bolson
>University of Washington Cardiovascular Research (206)543-4535
>bolson@u.washington.edu (preferred)
>bolson@max.bitnet bolson@milton.u.washington.edu (if you must)
--
Ed Bolson
University of Washington Cardiovascular Research (206)543-4535
bolson@u.washington.edu (preferred)
bolson@max.bitnet bolson@milton.u.washington.edu (if you must)