home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!gumby!yale!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark
- From: ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Compiler should generate virtual destructors
- Message-ID: <24702@alice.att.com>
- Date: 25 Jan 93 21:23:36 GMT
- Article-I.D.: alice.24702
- References: <1992Dec31.050150.28929@ucc.su.OZ.AU> <lkc2k7INNajv@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <harvey.727664973@regina> <24679@alice.att.com> <harvey.727978914@regina>
- Reply-To: ark@alice.UUCP ()
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ
- Lines: 11
-
- In article <harvey.727978914@regina> harvey@opl.com (Harvey Reed) writes:
-
- > Would this apply if the "compatibility mode" was phased out over time?
- > In a similar manner to how C vendors gradually migrated to ANSI C?
-
- Yes. While the "compatibility mode" is being phased out, I still
- have to write in the intersection of the two languages, until the
- old one is well and truly gone.
- --
- --Andrew Koenig
- ark@europa.att.com
-