NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3/NN_1993_3.iso/spool/comp/protocol/appletal/4540

Internet Message Format | 1993-01-27 | 1.2 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!opl.com!hri.com!noc.near.net!news.Brown.EDU!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!inesc.inesc.pt!animal.inescn.pt!mac4.inescn.pt!lquinta
From: [e-mail] (Luis Miguel Quinta)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Zone and Address relations
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 26 Jan 93 18:27:24 GMT
Sender: [e-mail] (USENET News System)
Organization: INESC Porto
Lines: 17
X-Xxmessage-Id: <[e-mail]>
X-Xxdate: Tue, 26 Jan 93 18:32:23 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: mac4.inescn.pt
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d17


Hi folks,

I've been trying to understand a situation that doesn't seem quit normal
to me.
I've noticed that I have, in my phase 2 network different addresses
putted into the same zone names. So, I can see a node 11000.100 node on a
zone named Ethernet as I could look a 11001.200 one in the same zone
number (different net numbers for equal zone names).
Is this correct ? shouldn't a zone name have a unique net address as in
localtalk zones ?

Please reply me directly trough e-mail and, if justifies, I'll summarize.

Thanks all

Luis Quinta