home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ukma!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!b61442.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu!sal8
- From: sal8@po.cwru.edu (Steve Luzynski)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
- Subject: Re: diff between emx/gcc and plain gcc
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 22:38:40 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <sal8.332.728174320@po.cwru.edu>
- References: <smithgr.728096523@rintintin.Colorado.EDU> <1993Jan27.101549.24386@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: b61442.student.cwru.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan27.101549.24386@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> gtd543a@sol.crt.columbia.edu (death) writes:
- >From: gtd543a@sol.crt.columbia.edu (death)
- >Subject: Re: diff between emx/gcc and plain gcc
- >Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 10:15:49 GMT
- >Gregory P. Smith (smithgr@rintintin.Colorado.EDU) wrote:
- >: The subject says it all. What are the differenced between gcc and emx/gcc
- >: ports for OS/2. What do each of them have that the other doesn't etc.. Which
- >: produces better code?
- >
- >emx is gcc and more...
- >
- >emx includes a bunch of OS/2 specific things you might want, such as
- >a text window manager, PM support, etc. gcc is just gcc.
-
- emx also has a debugger and faster floating point support. The executable
- files are also smaller if you use emx.dll.
-
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- steve luzynski @ case western reserve university in cleveland, oh
- sal8@po.cwru.edu | voice calls testily accepted at x2153.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Editor - OS/2 Programmer's Magazine. Watch for it!
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- OS/2 developer and user. got an idea? mail it in!
-