home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!yale.edu!yale!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!unruh
- From: unruh@physics.ubc.ca (William Unruh)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
- Subject: Re: News on 2.1 Release
- Date: 22 Jan 1993 06:36:14 GMT
- Organization: The University of British Columbia
- Lines: 12
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1jo4kuINNid1@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>
- References: <hatton.727578160@cgl.ucsf.edu> <1993Jan21.201739.63024@cc.usu.edu> <1jnuctINNhuh@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <1993Jan22.053058.22968@wam.umd.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.ubc.ca
-
- kashmir@wam.umd.edu (Harold of the Rocks) writes:
-
- >>How are IBM going to run Windows (future plans) under OS2 without the
- >>protection schemes fighting?
-
- >They fixed Windows so that it operates correctly as a DPMI client.
-
- The net, and Soyring when he was here said that in future OS2 will not
- include Windows code- they will simply aallow MSWindows to run under
- OS2.
- My question was, how will they do that? It does not seem likely that MS
- will make all future Windows releases to be "good" clients.
-