home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!unruh
- From: unruh@physics.ubc.ca (William Unruh)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
- Subject: Re: News on 2.1 Release
- Date: 22 Jan 1993 04:49:33 GMT
- Organization: The University of British Columbia
- Lines: 13
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1jnuctINNhuh@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>
- References: <1jf40mINNph0@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <TXHmXB3w165w@vicuna.ocunix.on.ca> <1993Jan19.212146.21877@apgea.army.mil> <C14r53.CK3@utdallas.edu> <hatton.727578160@cgl.ucsf.edu> <1993Jan21.201739.63024@cc.usu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.ubc.ca
-
- slhpv@cc.usu.edu writes:
-
-
- > Package 2 = All windows 3.1 support if you stick the windows 3.1
- > installation disk in the drive when prompted
- > User pays IBM price (MS already got their money)
-
- Future IBM plans I believe. Does anyone know if it is possible to run
- Windows under an OS2 Dos ?- Just tried, objects to "another protected
- mode program running. Tried win /3 and it simply crashed with no error
- message. But ctrl-Esc brought me back to the desktop.
- How are IBM going to run Windows (future plans) under OS2 without the
- protection schemes fighting?
-