home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / comp / mail / elm / 4200 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-25  |  832 b   |  22 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!heiland
  3. From: heiland@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (david.j.heiland)
  4. Subject: Re: reliability of 2.4-pl17
  5. Organization: AT&T
  6. Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 20:07:23 GMT
  7. Message-ID: <1993Jan25.200723.25090@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>
  8. References: <1js0s6INNid@dsinc.dsi.com>
  9. Lines: 11
  10.  
  11. From article <1js0s6INNid@dsinc.dsi.com>, by syd@dsi.com (Syd Weinstein):
  12. > I am not happy with pl17 or pl20, pl21 probably won't be much
  13. > better due to the large amount of cleanup work in it.  However,
  14. > pl22 should be pretty stable.  (Actually PL21 is pretty stable,
  15. > but who knows what we broke)...
  16.  
  17. Exactly how do you mean this?  We're running ELM 2.4 pl17 and I'm wondering
  18. if we should worry, and what we should worry about, until pl22 is out.
  19.  
  20. --
  21. Dave Heiland  djh@neptune.att.com
  22.