home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!olivea!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!nic.umass.edu!dime!connolly
- From: connolly@livy.cs.umass.edu (Christopher Ian Connolly)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
- Subject: Re: Why Isn't Lisp a Mainstream Language?
- Message-ID: <59072@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Date: 24 Jan 93 20:10:50 GMT
- References: <1993Jan20.181244.8680@netlabs.com> <19930120191159.1.SWM@SUMMER.SCRC.Symbolics.COM> <1993Jan21.230642.18561@netlabs.com>
- Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu
- Reply-To: connolly@livy.cs.umass.edu (Christopher Ian Connolly)
- Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1993Jan21.230642.18561@netlabs.com> lwall@netlabs.com (Larry Wall) writes:
- >In article <19930120191159.1.SWM@SUMMER.SCRC.Symbolics.COM> SWM@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.com (Scott McKay) writes:
- >: In what way is Lisp "bland ... all the way through"?
- >
- >There's little visual distinctiveness to distinguish mentally
- >distinctive constructs.
-
- Uh, so English is just as bland? Or should we be using curly braces
- instead of parentheses? Syntactic Sugar...help!...I'm going
- hyperglycemic!! Somebody change my readtable...quick!!
- Christopher Ian Connolly connolly@cs.umass.edu
- Laboratory for Perceptual Robotics wa2ifi
- University of Massachusetts at Amherst Amherst, MA 01003
-