home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!venezia!penev
- From: penev@venezia (Penio Penev)
- Subject: Re: Recent FORTHs' guts (was: Documenting)
- References: <1993Jan25.145539.13494@email.tuwien.ac.at>
- Sender: nobody@ctr.columbia.edu
- Organization: Rockefeller University
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 06:22:16 GMT
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.062216.13356@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>
- Reply-To: penev@venezia.rockefeller.edu
- X-Posted-From: venezia.rockefeller.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu
- Lines: 12
-
- Anton Ertl (anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at) wrote:
- :
- : Note that just doing subroutine threading usually makes your system
- : slower (than direct threading). You have to go native code, i.e., add
- : inlining and optimization, to reap the benefits.
- :
-
- Sure. And this allows You to inline a few instructions in a
- time-critical portion by hand. (Yes, this is non-portable.)
-
- --Penio.
-
-