home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.th-darmstadt.de!iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de!schrod
- From: schrod@iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de (Joachim Schrod)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Is (p) instead of (p!=NULL) portable?
- Date: 26 Jan 1993 17:14:10 GMT
- Organization: TH Darmstadt, FG Systemprogrammierung
- Lines: 13
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1k3rh2INNo44@rs2.hrz.th-darmstadt.de>
- References: <1993Jan25.125627.29030@ugle.unit.no> <1993Jan26.091708.11214@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: spice.iti.informatik.th-darmstadt.de
-
- In article <1993Jan26.091708.11214@cbfsb.cb.att.com>, nh@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (nicholas.hounsome) writes:
- > From article <1993Jan25.125627.29030@ugle.unit.no>, by robert@alkymi.unit.no (Robert Schmidt):
- > >
- > > [is `if (p)' portable?]
- >
- > It is NOT portable for C.
-
- That's not correct. Read the FAQ of comp.lang.c for an answer, I
- don't want to re-iterate the FM here. (Grab it by anon ftp from
- rtfm.mit.edu, in the usenet/news.answers subtree.)
-
- --
- Joachim
-