home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!mole-end!mat
- From: mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us
- Subject: Re: Why is C++ not considered a true OOL?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.013122.14002@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>
- Summary: Greatest Achievement
- Organization: :
- References: <19JAN199315162645@trentu.ca> <51571@shamash.cdc.com> <1993Jan21.005415.2812@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 01:31:22 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1993Jan21.005415.2812@ucc.su.OZ.AU>, maxtal@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (John MAX Skaller) writes:
-
- > But your greatest achievement, Bjarne, in my opinion,
- > was the name dominance rule, because, coupled with virtual
- > bases and abstract classes that enables mixins.
-
- Bjarne's greatest achievement, IMO, was getting A-W to publish the
- first book, thereby making C++ a `serious' language in the eyes of the
- masses _and_ their managers.
-
- (Bjarne, I don't mean to slight any of the other great stuff you've
- done ...)
- --
- (This man's opinions are his own.)
- From mole-end Mark Terribile
-
- mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us, Somewhere in Matawan, NJ
-