home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
- Path: sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!news.cerf.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!world!srctran
- From: srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian)
- Subject: Re: Guest account at Center for Software Reuse
- In-Reply-To: rowe@umbc.edu's message of 26 Jan 1993 15:43:49 -0500
- Message-ID: <SRCTRAN.93Jan27141223@world.std.com>
- Sender: srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian)
- Organization: The World
- References: <1993Jan25.114636.10496@sei.cmu.edu> <SRCTRAN.93Jan25124952@world.std.com>
- <1993Jan26.113442.20695@sei.cmu.edu> <1k47q5INNiii@umbc7.umbc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 19:12:23 GMT
- Lines: 58
-
-
- >Two questions:
- > Have you thought about calling DSRO to apply for an account?
- >(Because of Export Controlled material there needs to be individual
- >accountability) [703-536-6900].
- > Because everyone else does it differently, does that make them right?
- >
- >Ken.
-
- Ken,
- Your questions reflect why reuse is so screwed up in the DoD.
- Reuse is a technology transfer problem. For those of us who try to
- earn a living on reuse and techtran, the key is marketing, marketing,
- marketing. I have to go out and find customers and sell, sell, sell.
- They are not going to come to me, I have to go to them. I shouldn't
- be calling DSRO - DSRO should be calling me and everyone else pushing
- their reusable software. DSRO, like all of the prior funded DoD
- reuse efforts, are groups of people in a business who don't want to
- be in a business. The result is the endless Santayana disasters that
- always repeat the prior mistakes.
-
- Sure there are different ways of doing things. The problem with
- DSRO, ASSET, RAPID, etc is that they never learn from the mistakes of
- previous efforts, nor do they seek out those who have succeeded with
- reuse. I know of half a dozen or so substantial reuse efforts in other
- branches of the government who have never been contacted by any of the
- DoD reuse efforts. What kind of incompetence does this show?
-
- For example, I am always seeking out collections of reusable software
- to add information on to my databases, a very active process. Not once
- has any DoD reuse effort ever contacted me to arrange to get at my
- information, or my techniques for tracking all of the government's software
- output on a budget of $2000 a year, or my knowledge of the locations of
- thousands and thousands of defense computer programs available publicly
- in source code form. What does this say about DSRO's real interest in
- reuse, as opposed to their real interest in spending whatever money they
- have been budgeted?
-
- If DSRO has to exist as a stand alone business, with no government
- support, with its current management and business practices, where users
- had to pay for access to reusable software, DSRO would be bankrupt in
- six months. If DSRO showed its user interface to their components library
- at any trade show or conference, they would be laughed off the stage
- (and having once seen the source code to the interface, a well justified
- laugh). What this means is that contractors don't like to spend
- money on reuse, and that efforts like DSRO are just another welfare
- subsidy to defense contractors too long coddled with blank-check
- government contracts, and a place to prepare resumes.
-
- Greg Aharonian
- Source Translation & Optimization
-
-
- --
- **************************************************************************
- Greg Aharonian
- Source Translation & Optimiztion
- P.O. Box 404, Belmont, MA 02178
-