home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle
- From: smj@jbecpor.demon.co.uk (Martin Jarvis)
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!concert!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!pipex!demon!jbecpor.demon.co.uk!smj
- Subject: Commit and ANSI SQL
- Organization: John Brown E&C Ltd
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
- Apparently-To: mail2news@news.demon.co.uk
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 09:51:52 +0000
- Message-ID: <C1K62G.4H6@jbecpor.demon.co.uk>
- Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
- Lines: 11
-
- I've just had a discussion with some colleagues about the use of Commit in
- Oracle. In particular that a commit will save _all_ outstanding changes. My
- boss seems to think that other databases allow concurrent transactions, thereby
- allowing individual changes to be saved separately.
-
- What does the ANSI standard for SQL say about this ?
-
- ________________________________________________________________________________
- Martin Jarvis | Internet - smj@jbecpor.demon.co.uk
- John Brown E & C Ltd | X.400 - Martin Jarvis /JBEC-Portsmouth, IT
- Portsmouth, England |
-