home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.databases
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-ulm.de!faw.uni-ulm.de!gaede
- From: gaede@faw.uni-ulm.de (Volker Gaede)
- Subject: Re: New Group for OODBMS
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.131544.14062@wega.rz.uni-ulm.de>
- Sender: news@wega.rz.uni-ulm.de (News Net)
- Organization: FAW (Research Institute For Applied Knowledge Processing, Ulm, Germany)
- References: <19705@mindlink.bc.ca> <1331@procor.UUCP>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 13:15:44 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1331@procor.UUCP>, jamesm@procor.dialogic.com (Mark James) writes:
- |>
- |> In article <19705@mindlink.bc.ca> John_Carson@mindlink.bc.ca (John Carson)
- |> writes:
- |> >The only problem I have with a object oriented group is I don't see enough
- |> >volume here to qualify another group.
- |>
- |> Really? Out of 43 messages in comp.databases today, seven of them deal
- |> with object-oriented databases, not counting the three discussing the
- |> possible creation of the new newsgroup. That's plenty to justify a new
- |> group. Plus, I'm sure that people who have to wade through the
-
-
- Sorry, but I just read 84 messages in comp.databases and there was only
- *one* OOBMS (Ontos) relevant question beside the FAQ for OODBMS and the discussion
- about the setting up an OODB-group. Where are the other messages?
-
- Volker
-
- ------------------------------+-------------+----------------------
- Volker Gaede + \\\|// + Tant d'histoire pour
- + |o o | + rien de tout.
- gaede@main01.rz.uni-ulm.de + O| L |D +
- gaede@faw9370.faw.uni-ulm.de + |\_/ | +
- gaede@faw.uni-ulm.de + \___/ +
- ------------------------------+-------------+----------------------
-