home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: co.general
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!boulder!colorado.edu!ejh
- From: ejh@khonshu.colorado.edu (Edward J. Hartnett)
- Subject: Re: Amnd.2 Boycott is Counterproductive.
- In-Reply-To: kooros@refuge.Colorado.EDU's message of Thu, 21 Jan 1993 06:00:45 GMT
- Message-ID: <EJH.93Jan21095317@khonshu.colorado.edu>
- Sender: news@colorado.edu (The Daily Planet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: khonshu.colorado.edu
- Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado
- References: <1993Jan21.060045.16768@colorado.edu>
- Distribution: co
- Date: 21 Jan 93 09:53:17
- Lines: 56
-
- In article <1993Jan21.060045.16768@colorado.edu> kooros@refuge.Colorado.EDU (Paul T. Kooros) writes:
-
- IMHO, Coloradans seeking to advance the "Boycott Colorado" movement
- are misguided. They are contributing to a self-destructive anti-productive
- movement which itself practices discrimination, targets for vengeance
- harmless groups, and fails to target culprit groups. The movement's focus
- is on the collective punishment of "Colorado" (a practice forbidden governments
- by the Geneva and Hague conventions), and offers joining individuals the
- self-indulgent relief of their consciences. This, rather than address
- rectifying the situation. Let me explain myself:
- <snip>
- I can only imagine that people joining "Boycott Colorado" do so
- primarily for the pacification of their consciences. I suggest that
- practicing political correctness for the purpose of feeling good is
- a gross hypocrisy. Instead of self-indulgently venting your anger at
- society, I suggest that you undertake the battle for the hearts and minds
- of Coloradans. Have you ever talked to a farmer or rancher about Amnd. 2?
- I thought not.
-
- I think you're missing the real target of the boycott, which is not
- Colorado, but every other state. Since something like 12 states now
- have organizations working for something like A2, it seems to me quite
- possible that a perceived economic hardship in Colorado because of A2
- will influence the voters and politicians of other states. The smart
- politicians and businessmen will come out against their local version,
- claiming that economic hardship will follow.
-
- While I agree that the boycott against Colorado will be unlikely to
- have short term effects in this state, it's not inconceivable to me
- that it would have the effect over the course of the next couple of
- years of swinging Colorado against A2. Only a small percentage of the
- population need be convinced to change their vote for another
- amendment to repeal it.
-
- And finally, why should any gay-rights activist care about the
- individual people of Colorado? Do you care that the boycott of South
- America probably hurt plenty of people who never discriminated against
- blacks, or were working for their benifit? There's bound to be innocent
- victims in any boycott, but that doesn't mean that boycotts shouldn't
- be used.
-
- Not that I support the boycott of Colorado; I just think it's naive to
- say it won't have any good effects for gay-rights activists. They now
- have a visible opponent and a cause to rally around. Obviously they
- hope that when all is said and done this battle will be won in every
- state, by convincing the country that passing A2-like laws is a bad
- idea and causes lots of trouble and problems for the state. From their
- point of view a boycott against Colorado is proabably a good stratigic
- move.
-
-
- --
- Don't blame me, I voted against Amendment 2!
-
- Edward Hartnett ejh@khonshu.colorado.edu
-
-