home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UCS.INDIANA.EDU!DAY
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.notabene
- Message-ID: <NOTABENE%93012205050353@TAUNIVM>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 22:06:11 EST
- Sender: Nota Bene List <NOTABENE@TAUNIVM.BITNET>
- From: Dorothy Day <DAY@UCS.INDIANA.EDU>
- Subject: Re: NBI Technical Support
- Lines: 57
-
- After a decade or more of witnessing the sordid process of corporate
- buyouts and often hostile takeovers, we've earned the right to be
- suspicious of a company none of us know much about that takes over
- "our" shelter from the storms (or, the company we love to hate, or--
- supply your own description). We don't know their motives in buying
- out two small, floundering gems in a world of a few crass giants.
- After all, if the originators and developers of these wonderful
- products couldn't make a go of it, what makes them look like such a
- great investment?
-
- Well, it's not the first time great software remained too long in the
- hands of people who couldn't negotiate the business jungle well enough
- to survive. Design vision and marketing skill don't necessarily come
- together in the same people. How many of us are good at marketing our
- own outstanding skills?
-
- The Technology Group seems to think that by providing sufficient
- capital infusion they can keep the two products alive, allow the
- developers to improve them, and find further winning combinations of
- the existing code with other products. For that we can be grateful for
- a time, at least. If down the road they let either product die off,
- they've at least bought us some time with the existing products and
- ensured that the necessary fixes for the new versions get completed.
-
- (And by the way, it would be more logical to acquire XyQuest for the
- underlying code of NB than to acquire NBI for the refinements to XYW
- code. I don't really know the order in which the two companies were
- purchased, but I believe it was a package agreement.)
-
- To cry betrayal by people who have worn themselves nearly to death
- keeping the faith with us seems the height of selfrighteousness.
- Yes, it's true that they are guilty of faulty judgment about how many
- more features could be crammed into each product and still make it out
- the door "on time." This is a pattern we have seen with each new
- version. And yes, that very pattern finally bankrupted the companies.
- Polyannaism, yes. But betrayal? Hardly.
-
- We take ourselves so seriously. We don't yell at a publisher for not
- getting out a new edition of a reference book we depend on, and which
- badly needs updating. Book publishers generally don't advertise far
- ahead of publication. But any librarians on this list know that
- publishers DO take in subscriptions, offer pre-publication discounts for
- pre-payment, in the case of massive reference sets. The money is used
- to underwrite the actual costs of getting it out the door. And delays
- routinely occur in these large projects too. But individual purchasers
- rarely see this side of publishing. With software we see it, and feel
- "betrayed." We have a Right to get it--On Time! Delay means disaster.
-
- Well, we are advised by the experts never to depend on a product not
- already available. Yes, we needed those promised features. But to
- design that research project that will get us tenure so as to depend
- on a "promised" software package shows faulty judgment on OUR part.
- Let him who has faultless judgment cast the first stone...
-
- Dorothy Day, Indiana University
- Bitnet: DAY@IUBACS
- Internet: day@ucs.indiana.edu
-