home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!yale!yale.edu!not-for-mail
- From: yarvin@cs.yale.edu (Norman Yarvin)
- Newsgroups: alt.peeves
- Subject: Re: More Gun Control
- Date: 28 Jan 1993 00:00:06 -0500
- Organization: Yale Computer Science Department
- Lines: 28
- Message-ID: <1k7p8nINN5sg@CATHY.NA.CS.YALE.EDU>
- References: <1993Jan28.014844.14393@msc.cornell.edu> <1993Jan28.023033.2558@muddcs.claremont.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cathy.na.cs.yale.edu
-
- shampton@jarthur.claremont.edu (Scott M Hampton) writes:
- >Look, Scott, Physics 1a just isn't gonna cut it.
-
- The physics you know is apparently also insufficient.
-
- > The bullet leaves the
- >barrel of most firearms at extra-Mach velocities. Thus the crack. When in a
- >free fall, however, the speed of sound is the ultimate limit on velocity.
-
- The word is "terminal velocity", creep. And it has little to do with the
- speed of sound.
-
- Peeve: physics abuse. The phenomenon where a person who knows physics
- superficially tries to use it to intimidate innocent victims.
-
- This thread is a prime example. What started it was Geoff giving a
- perfectly good explanation of shooting a bullet up. Geoff's explanation
- was so good that it didn't even use any physics terms. Thus our first
- physics abuser saw what looked like easy prey, and attacked. In such a
- primitive fashion that he revealed himself to be prey. Thus a second
- physics abuser proceeded to attack the first one. And, naturally, they
- were both wrong. Because if they were the sort of person with any real
- concern for the truth, they would have learned their physics better in the
- first place.
-
-
- --
- Norman Yarvin yarvin@cs.yale.edu
-