home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.peeves
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rock!concert!samba!usenet
- From: Blair.Haworth@launchpad.unc.edu (Blair Haworth)
- Subject: Re: More Gun Control
- Message-ID: <1993Jan23.150327.17644@samba.oit.unc.edu>
- Sender: usenet@samba.oit.unc.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lambada.oit.unc.edu
- Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
- References: <1993Jan21.132452.1981@dg-rtp.dg.com> <1993Jan21.195252.11505@igor.tamri.com> <1jqp5fINN246@lynx.unm.edu>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 15:03:27 GMT
- Lines: 42
-
- In article <1jqp5fINN246@lynx.unm.edu> gregm@centauri.unm.edu (greg moritz) writes:
- >> cochran@spam.rtp.dg.com(A. Jing Hippy) writes:
- >> >But we don't *need* the guns. If they weren't around, then that's 1400
- >> >people that would still be here today.
- >> were NOT people who have been trained to handle guns safely.
-
- [...]
- >I don't think that you can translate 1400 deaths by firearms into 1400 less
- >deaths were the firearms eliminated. If there were no guns available, how
- >many of those 1400 would have been shot with bow and arrow or blowguns? Some
- >of those 1400 deaths were, no doubt deliberate. How many of those gunshots
- >would have been replaced by stabs with something pointy? etc.
-
- Nonono. That 1400-death figure (~5.6 per million population) is
- _accidental_ casualties, so the point, while well-taken, is inappropriate.
- The proper question to ask is this:
-
- A lot (arguably almost all, but let's be charitable) of these 1400, or
- rather, the people who incurred the 1400 deaths, can be categorized as
- idiots; isn't it kind of likely that they'd've still rung up a pretty good
- score without the help of ordnance? Unless you live like Emily Dickinson
- (arguably the sort of life the Nat'l Safety Council would like to see us
- lead), everyday life is fraught with perils even if you've got a decent
- supply of clues. How many of these 1400 stiffs would still have been
- created by these same clowns sticking a fork in the toaster, running their
- car into a tree (or bus, or LP tanker), misusing household chemicals, or
- getting squicked by lawn darts?
-
- Peeve: the idea that the government exists to make the world safe for
- goofballs.
-
- !Peeve: P.J. O'Rourke's seminal essay "Safety Nazis": Pain is the body's
- way of showing us we're boneheads."
-
- For some unfathomable reason,
-
-
- --
- The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
- North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
- Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
- internet: laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
-