home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu!fmsrl7!lynx.unm.edu!centauri.unm.edu!gregm
- From: gregm@centauri.unm.edu (greg moritz)
- Newsgroups: alt.peeves
- Subject: Re: More Gun Control
- Date: 23 Jan 1993 06:38:39 GMT
- Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
- Lines: 17
- Sender: gregm@centauri.unm.edu (gregory r ger moritzthsesg)
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1jqp5fINN246@lynx.unm.edu>
- References: <1jhbv0INNaa6@umbc4.umbc.edu> <1993Jan19.230523.28900@igor.tamri.com> <1993Jan21.132452.1981@dg-rtp.dg.com> <1993Jan21.195252.11505@igor.tamri.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pioneer.unm.edu
-
- > cochran@spam.rtp.dg.com(A. Jing Hippy) writes:
- > >But we don't *need* the guns. If they weren't around, then that's 1400
- > >people that would still be here today.
- >
- donb@igor.tamri.com (Don Baldwin) responded:
- > Thirdly, I imagine (pure speculation) that those people who were killed
- > were NOT people who have been trained to handle guns safely.
-
- I don't think that you can translate 1400 deaths by firearms into 1400 less
- deaths were the firearms eliminated. If there were no guns available, how
- many of those 1400 would have been shot with bow and arrow or blowguns? Some
- of those 1400 deaths were, no doubt deliberate. How many of those gunshots
- would have been replaced by stabs with something pointy? etc.
-
- > p.s. Did someone REALLY try to back into a stove with dynamite up their
- > butt at Banta's party?
-
-