home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!news.Brown.EDU!news.Brown.EDU!news
- From: SL500000@brownvm.brown.edu (Robert Mathiesen)
- Newsgroups: alt.magick
- Subject: Re: Berkeley OTO and Wicca
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 07:46:02 EST
- Organization: Brown University - Providence, Rhode Island USA
- Lines: 50
- Message-ID: <1k0ncrINNkub@cat.cis.Brown.EDU>
- References: <1jegl5INNra7@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> <73820@cup.portal.com> <1993Jan24.122303.20331@netcom.com> <1jvl7jINNbec@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: brownvm.brown.edu
- X-News-Software: BNN via BNN_POST v1.0 beta
-
- In article <1jvl7jINNbec@shelley.u.washington.edu>,
- mimir@hardy.u.washington.edu (Al Billings) said:
-
- >>A really nice piece of work on the origins of Witchcraft is
- >>_Crafting the Art of Magic: A History of Modern Witchcraft 1939-1964_
- >>Aidan Kelly, Llewellyn, 1991.
- >
- > The book is crap. He ignores evidence (since I know people questioned by
- >him who told him things that contradict what he wrote) that doesn't fit
- >his conclusions, his conclusions cannot be derived from the evidence, and
- >the whole thing has more wholes than swiss cheese.
-
- However, Kelly did find and correctly assess Gardner's manuscript "Ye
- Bok of ye Art Magical" at Toronto, did correctly evaluate the material
- from Weschcke's files and the Cardell's' pamphlet _Witch_ (1964), and
- did show that the "Old Laws" are not all that old. I, too, do not
- wholly agree with Kelly's conclusions, but we differ chiefly on the
- existence of a group before Gardner which was responsible for a manu-
- script behind the Toronto manuscript (I think there is evidence for such
- a group's having been formed about 1929). -- We also have somewhat
- different judgements of the influence of Gardner's own sexuality on
- the theory and practice of magic within Gardner's witchcraft. At least,
- it is my impression that Kelly sees all that binding and scourging in an
- essentially negative light, as irrelevant to the working of the magic
- and as just an illegitimate insertion of Gardner's own sexual gratifi-
- cation into the rituals of his witchcraft. I, on the other hand, find
- evidence that seems to me quite good for the utility of binding and/or
- scourging in raising "power" (or whatever one chooses to call it), and
- also that Gardner (or whoever first introduced all that binding and
- scourging into the work of witchcraft, for Gardner was not the only
- Englishman who has been reputed to be fond of these sexual practices)
- managed to transcend his own gratification and create a legitimate reli-
- gious theory and practice which employs these things. It's chiefly an
- ethical quarrel: I think that an ethically sound religious practice can
- arise from ethically reprehensible sources or motives, whereas Kelly
- seems less certain that this can be so -- or perhaps only that it *was*
- so in this particular case. -- So don't throw the baby out with the
- bathwater: Kelly's work on sources is very valuable, though the
- historical and psychological assessment of the origins of Gardner's
- witchcraft seem to me to be a bit less so. -- One note of warning:
- some of the texts are reproduced in hard-to-follow ways in Kelly's
- published book, with paragraphs from different sources (written at
- different times) merged by Kelly to create the appearance of a single
- document. The unpublished version is much better in this respect, but
- unfortunately remains ... unpublished. Sometimes it seems almost as if
- Kelly was trying to weave these source documents together to create his
- own Gardnerian Book of Shadows, instead of just providing materials for
- historical study. -- Robert
-
- Robert Mathiesen, Brown University, SL500000@BROWNVM
-