home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!cpac.washington.edu!joshua
- From: joshua@cpac.washington.edu (Joshua Geller)
- Newsgroups: alt.magick
- Subject: Re: alchemy (was: Re: Dracula the Alchemist)
- Date: 21 Jan 93 22:51:28 GMT
- Organization: Institute for the Study of Ancient Science
- Lines: 24
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <JOSHUA.93Jan21145128@bailey.cpac.washington.edu>
- References: <1993Jan19.055826.12642@sobeco.com> <83950164@otter.hpl.hp.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: bailey.cpac.washington.edu
- In-reply-to: cal@otter.hpl.hp.com's message of Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:13:57 GMT
-
-
- In article <83950164@otter.hpl.hp.com> cal@otter.hpl.hp.com (Colin Low)
- writes:
-
- > The chemical behaviour of elements is determined by their electron shells.
- > Mercury and gold are adjacent on the periodic table, and despite the huge
- > difference in properties they differ by only one (1) electron, and because
- > the nucleus is in one is more positive than the other, by a difference in
- > energy levels etc. This isn't a *huge* difference - we aren't talking
- > about chalk and cheese here. I wouldn't categorically rule out the
- > possibility of a doping substance which (in the manner of semiconductor
- > doping) mops up free electrons or otherwise changes the band structure to
- > give a result which is chemically *very close* to gold. Not identical, but
- > close enough to fool a < 1900 AD chemist.
-
- this is a seductive idea; Ia lwys thought, though, that the properties of an
- element were caused by their nuclear makeup (deuterium, for instance,
- behaves more like hydrogen than it does like helium).
-
- the person who helped me out with a lot of this was, BTW, by profession
- an electrical engineer type or something like that. he seemed to think
- that the change was nuclear in nature.
-
- josh
-