home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.flame
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU!jbl3g
- From: jbl3g@faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU (Jason Basinger Linkins)
- Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.014641.14877@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia
- References: <1993Jan24.160614.1@udphvx.cineca.it> <1993Jan25.022943.9366@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1993Jan25.112500.1@udphvx.cineca.it>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 01:46:41 GMT
- Lines: 105
-
- In article <1993Jan25.112500.1@udphvx.cineca.it> dallagata@udphvx.cineca.it writes:
- >How comes that *all* the other flamer understand what I write,
- >and you "smart" boy DON'T UNDERSTAND ANY FUCK?!?!?
- Most people "understand" that you are a fool, who prides himself in your
- "drivel" and will never amount to anything except an alt.flame whipping
- boy.
-
- >> proof: a piece of substantive material that can serve as evidence
- >> that something is so (Example: The fact that you have been
- >> wrong twice in the post prove the claim that you are an
- >> "utter moron."
- >
- >That's the definition. I was speaking about the meaning.
- HAHAHAHA!!! That's really good, Michele. Why not carry a neon sign around
- with you that reads: "Look at me, I'm as ignorant as can be!" Let me know
- when you grasp the concept of synonyms. Maybe it'll be in your next
- "English for Limp Losers" class.
-
- >I can drink gallons of beer every evening. Trust me, I can
- >put you below the table even with beer, I already did with
- >you americans. Puah! Italians drink since we are born, we
- >don't need to wait to be 21 years old...
-
- We have ways of getting around that silly little 21 thing...
-
- >I've already shown you once that you were WRONG! Do I have
- >to do it all my life? That time you did not answer, and
- >there was the original sentence. Go back and check, idiot.
- WHen you look at your orignal post, you will see...
-
- >I said that I respect losers. What I meant is that I respect
- >the people that lose against me.
- SO you don't respect anyone!
-
- >I am not able to find the post that say that I respect
- >asshole. Sorry, you lie.
- Sorry, you are just incompetent.
- >
- >WHAAAT? I can't take it?!? But if I am always here! SHUT UP, boy!
- Well, I am sorry that you are always at your desk posting, no doubt
- with a can of piss-poor Italian beer in one hand and your limp dick
- in the other.
-
- >I repeat: YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE THAT THINK IN THIS WAY. I
- >have just to make a call to all the macho all the net, and
- >you *die*.
-
- That's right. You promised me a "war." Well, I am waiting for all of your
- storied "supporters" to come out of the woodwork. Yes, you just get your
- boys to flame away. They may do better than you have done.
-
- >You mean that John Belushy was not fun? I hope not, because,
- >if you do, well, I can image which kind of "party" you
- >cavaliers do...
- Oh, don't get me wrong, Belushi was hysterical. A classic. I sincerely hope
- that you do your best to emulate his life in every aspect (except the humor
- of course, we know you do not have the concept down, yet).
-
- >One? I give you a more generic answer: ALL THE MACHOS OF ALT.FLAME!!!
- >They are my soldiers (and I know that they we more women
- >than you "cavaliers"...).
- Is this your invisible "army". I bet Cadet Witty is in charge of it.
-
- >You mist the point. I am creative, I am fun, my drivels are
- >ironic. Moana compared me to Charlie Chaplin, you are an
- >actor, you can be only envious...(touche')
- If you still think Moana's comparison was what it seemed, the you really are
- clueless.
-
-
- >> Why am I getting laid on a regular basis and you have to rape?
- >
- >Because, as I told you, you don't have fantasy to create new
- >experiences. You know, always the same soup becomes boring...
- This is all too telling. I'm sorry that the diminishment of your masculinity
- has led to endless raping and encounters at the local leather bars, but don't
- recommend I similarly degrade myself.
-
- >You are not studing Formal Logic, right? Because I see a big
- >LACK OF LOGIC ON YOUR POSTS. One can use we/us refering to
- >him/her and another person! YOU ARE WRONG!
- You see a lack of formal logic in my posts?? You are a fool! You are the one
- who claims the opinions of two people (Two fuckwits, no less) constitute
- "the general feeling of alt.flame". Where do you get your logic? Eurodisney?
-
- You and Liz now
- make up the "general consensus" of alt.flame?! Get a fucking clue.
- >
- >WHERE DID I WRITE THAT YOU WERE ANNOYING *ALL* ALT.FLAME?!?
- >How can you be so stupid?
- You wrote, and I quote
- "The general feeling of alt.flame is that you are a..."
- In case you didn't know, "general feeling" means that it is a feeling shared
- by all. You and Liz are not all.
- I repeat for your benefit...
- >> You prove everyday that you are a bigger moron than we originally thought.
- >> You better learn some basic math before you flame me again.
- >
- >ALL the brits are Boring, even your couple of idiots. Only a moron can
- >laugh for what a brit says (that's why brits are morons).
-
- Well, now you have brought the wrath of all Britiah residents of alt.flame,
- I'm afraid. They will be on you like carrion birds on the dead carcass I
- have left of you.
-
-