NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3/NN_1993_3.iso/spool/alt/flame/19300

Internet Message Format | 1993-01-25 | 11.2 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!fnnews.fnal.gov!udphvx!dallagata
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 25 Jan 93 11:25:00 +0000
Organization: None
Lines: 273
Distribution: na
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>>> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>>>>
>>> No.  Liz, like you, is almost universally hated.  When she posts, flamers
>>> from all over the net swoop down upon her and pick her pitiful missives
>>> apart right in front of her.  They do the same with you.
>>
>>The first time that I cam to alt.flame, Liz was not here for
>>a little time. There were posts asking for her. Yuo are
>>WRONG.              ^^^^^^
>
> Like the true idiot that you are, you post a response that has nothing to
> do with what I have said.  Where in the above article of mine do I say,
> "There were no posts on alt.flame for Liz before Michele got here"?
> Nowhere.  It is you, who is once again, wrong.

How comes that *all* the other flamer understand what I write,
and you "smart" boy DON'T UNDERSTAND ANY FUCK?!?!?

I WROTE "ASKING"! There was people that wanted to have Liz
*BACK*! You are an idiot.
>
>>I know many flase intellectual as you that are really stupid
>>(as you are). They don't use their "mind" to think, no, they
>>use the minds of the writers, and then they report what
>>somebody else thought.
>
> "Flase intellectuals"?  Good try.  Remember how to form simple
> one-syllable words next time.  What writers am I using?  Can you
> name one?  Twice in one post, you are WRONG.

[1] English is my second language. It is easy to make
    mistakes and anyway, the spelling flames suck...

[2] I don't know in english, but in Italian we put the
    concept at the end of the sentence. My answer was
    belove

------------------------------------------------------------
>>That's why you say bullshit, here. You don't report anything.
>>You are a moron.
------------------------------------------------------------

You see what I wrote? That explains why you are a moron.
Unable to use your brainless head and not reporting anything,
you write *only* crap. Also, *you* were WRONG!
>>
>>>Moreover, I have proved beyond all doubt, and will continue
>>> to do so, that you are an utter moron.
>>
>>You neither know the meaning of the word "proof".
>
> proof:  a piece of substantive material that can serve as evidence
>     that something is so (Example:  The fact that you have been
>     wrong twice in the post prove the claim that you are an
>     "utter moron."

That's the definition. I was speaking about the meaning.
Infact you see that I prooved that your example is wrong.
But you can't understand this...
>
> That's three times you are wrong.

See above.
>>>
> Well, okay, I changed it.  But once again, it was to correct an error of
> yours.  For a fine example of a "lame", archive all of your posts.
> Read them.  If you can't get your mommy to help you.  I'm sure she'll
> be free after your father finishes his Monday morning rape.

BWAHAHAHAHA HA HA HA HA. You can't remedy such a *MISTAKE*.
Don't lame yourself.
>>
>>What's the definition of human being, you?!?
> Well, you see, unlike you, I walk upright on my hind legs.  I also do
> not have a primitive homo erectus skull like you.  Let's see, my
> opposeable thumbs, my spinal column...yep, physiologically I *am*
> a human.  When you evolve, I am sure your doctor will let you know.

Yes, but psycologically you are a moron.
>
>>You are just a broken computer, you neural network is down.
>>Ask to K E N about how to fix it.
>
> Anyone who would recommend K E N's advice is a blithering fool.  I bet
> he's your ideal flamer.  Get a life.

You are wrong. I agree that KEN has not a big flame
experience, but he knows machines very well. He can fix you,
even if you will never be able to flame, like him.
>
>>OK! Tequila Cuervo the friday, Long Island Ice tea the
>>saturday, Beer the sunday, Margarita the monday and Beer
>>again all the other nights. Let me know.
>
> You fucking pussy!  I'm ready to eat the worm seven days a week!  What
> is this fucking sissy beer stuff?

I can drink gallons of beer every evening. Trust me, I can
put you below the table even with beer, I already did with
you americans. Puah! Italians drink since we are born, we
don't need to wait to be 21 years old...
>
> You have said that you respect people you do not tolerate.  That is *exactly*
> how you said it.  Archive your posts if you have any doubts.

I've already shown you once that you were WRONG! Do I have
to do it all my life? That time you did not answer, and
there was the original sentence. Go back and check, idiot.

>You have also
> said that you have respect for losers and assholes.  That must be so
> you can possibly respect yourself.

I said that I respect losers. What I meant is that I respect
the people that lose against me.

> Read your own posts.  It is all RIGHT THERE.

I am not able to find the post that say that I respect
asshole. Sorry, you lie.
>
> Maybe if they haven't said anything, it is because they are enjoying
> the daily hell I put your stupid ass through, eh?

You know, moron. I really would like to be in the same party,
to show you as I can put you belove the table and after that
how I fuck all the chickies that are around (just to show you
that women like me...)
>
>>Liz beat you constantly. You lie.
> Liz, has never *beaten* me.  Liz is a stupid pig.  SHe has tried and failed.
> So have you similarly tried and failed.  I can't decide which one of you
> has failed more miserably.

Proud of yourself, eh? How can a moron like you to trust in
himself? You are a loser, man.
>
>  I see what's on your
> mind, you are saying "Please don't attack me anymore!  I can't take it."

WHAAAT? I can't take it?!? But if I am always here! SHUT UP, boy!

> Well, I'm having fun making you look like an idiot.  When any woman on
> this net says, lay off of poor Michelina, then I'll lay off you.

Such a hope. No way, *nobody* did it to me before on my life.
I don't know how you can only think it.

> You
> better realise that the reason no one does is because everyone is enjoying
> me pounding you into pastry on a daily basis.

I repeat: YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE THAT THINK IN THIS WAY. I
have just to make a call to all the macho all the net, and
you *die*.
>
>>My mascot was John Belushy...
> How fitting...

You mean that John Belushy was not fun? I hope not, because,
if you do, well, I can image which kind of "party" you
cavaliers do...
>
>>> At any rate, I am not out to play Cavalier.  I am out to showcase your
>>> stupidity for all to see.  And I am doing a fine job.
>>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>You are the only one that says that.
> Find one person who agrees with you!  ONE!  Go ahead and try you poor
> misguided fuckstain!  Be my fucking guest! HAHA!

One? I give you a more generic answer: ALL THE MACHOS OF ALT.FLAME!!!
They are my soldiers (and I know that they we more women
than you "cavaliers"...).
>>>>
>>You insult yourself when you want to compliment a woman.

> Coming from someone who insults himself everytime he posts (taking pride
> in your self-acclaimed "drivel" for instance) this has little affect on me.

You mist the point. I am creative, I am fun, my drivels are
ironic. Moana compared me to Charlie Chaplin, you are an
actor, you can be only envious...(touche')
>
> Oh you fool, the only thing you might know about Tab is that it is a soft
> drink.  Was the underline perfect when it got to me? NOOOOOOOO! Idiot.

Who cares? You were supposed to modify it. I don't want to
use the space if I can use the Tab key, it takes more time,
and, you know, I am lazy.
>
>>> I believe that I was called the "sensitive defender of women's RIGHTS", yes.
>>
>>*Who* said this bullshit? Where?
> Oh, don't pretend you haven't seen it, asshole! You responded to that post!!

I saw it, I wanted to have your answer moron! It was ANDY!
He was having fun *of* you, Moron! And anyway, what Andy
thinks doesn't mind. He is an idiot like you.
>>
>>Women like pig, moron. Pigs have fantasy making love, not as
>>you cold intellectuals.
> Why am I getting laid on a regular basis and you have to rape?

Because, as I told you, you don't have fantasy to create new
experiences. You know, always the same soup becomes boring...

>>But fuck you, idiot! You have been flamed also to be a moron.
> The people who have flamed me include Liz, Witty, Jorn, and yourself.
> Maybe you two should form your own flame group "Lizzie and the Net.cretins".
> The company you keep is not stellar.

Which company do you belong to? Kevin Darcy & C.?
>>
>>> ATTN:  Any woman who has ever said this to Michele, please let me know!!
>>> Somehow, I know you are lying.
>>
>>They are too much wonderful, they don't speak with losers
>>like you.
>
> I want proof that they speak to loser like yourself.

BUT WHY, WHY, WHY you are so stupid?!?!? I WAS SPEAKING
ABOUT REAL LIFE, IDIOT! There are not real women on the net,
silly boy.

>>It is a general feeling in alt.flame, that you are a cold,
>>annoying, moron. So, I said *us*. Anyway, two is enough to
>>say us, ask to Liz...
>
> So you and Liz are suddenly the majority of alt.flame!

You are not studing Formal Logic, right? Because I see a big
LACK OF LOGIC ON YOUR POSTS. One can use we/us refering to
him/her and another person! YOU ARE WRONG!

>You and Liz now
> make up the "general consensus" of alt.flame?!  Get a fucking clue.

I did moron. You are stupid, you don't think, you just spit
shit out of your mouth. You are worse than Martin Hanningam.

> How many people are in this newgroup?  Maybe twenty?  And you say
> two people makes up the "general feeling in alt.flame"?
> You are saying that because ten percent, say so, then it's true.

I am saying that YOU ARE ANNOYING *US* (at leat me and Liz
but for sure somebody else).
WHERE DID I WRITE THAT YOU WERE ANNOYING *ALL* ALT.FLAME?!?
How can you be so stupid?

> You prove everyday that you are a bigger moron than we originally thought.
> You better learn some basic math before you flame me again.

Math?!?!? Are you crazy? YOU ARE TELLING ME TO STUDY MATH?
You don't know what you are talking about.
Little boy, maybe sometime I have problem with english, but
with formal logic I can beat you everywhere. I know it.
>>>
>>I already did, once. I had to. They all were so sorry.
> HAHAHAHAHA!!! Having delusions of grandeur again.  No one is ever sorry
> to see someone leave alt.flame!  We don't sit back and bemoan each others

>>You have the humor of a brit.
> Oh, my!  Quite a (f)lame, there, michelina!  If that puts me in the
> same category as John Cleese and Michael Caine, then I thank you
> for the compliment.

ALL the brits are Boring, even your couple of idiots. Only a moron can
laugh for what a brit says (that's why brits are morons).
>
    Michele