NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3/NN_1993_3.iso/spool/alt/flame/19297

Internet Message Format | 1993-01-25 | 3.7 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!warwick!not-for-mail
From: [e-mail] (Mr J S Graley)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Date: 25 Jan 1993 17:32:57 -0000
Organization: Computing Services, University of Warwick, UK
Lines: 74
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lily.csv.warwick.ac.uk

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
|In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Mr J S Graley) writes:
|
|> (1) Someone rightly points out to her that showing off using words like
|>     axiom and oxymoron. She responds by frigging off her little ego and
|>     going on about scrabble.
|
|TRANSLATION:
|  I am a complete illiterate and could not have possibly been able to look up
|these HUGE words unless if someone could tell me how to spell them properly.

Hey 'phantom' you twat, it was ALREADY IN ENGLISH, hence there was no need
for you to translate it. As it is, you have tried to translate from english
to english, something even Titty could do easily. And yet you _still_ fuck up!
What you wrote was entirely different to my original posting. The grammar
was different. The words were different. You even got the wrong number of
sentances!

You presumably think your 'translation' is a flame. But it is not. It is a sad
attempt to look like a prat, which would be a good thing for a cunt-shit-toss
pot like you.

|> (2) She stupidly makes a spelling mistake. Someone is kind enough to point
|>     it out to her, and she replies with a stupid winge about spelling
|>     flames.
|
|SEE ABOVE

Suppose my terminal was upside down. Then it would need to be 'SEE BELOW'.
You should consider all eventualities, cock-sucker.

|> Kathy, ever used the word 'hypocrite' in a game of scrabble?
|
|J.us S.tupid, did you ever use the words "futile", "moronic", "atrophic",
|"boring", "repetitive", "predictable" or "anal-retentive" in a game of
|scrabble? Oh wait... I'll help you with your reply... you'll apply them to
|me... You have to do better than that SlimeLime. Did I mention you were
|predictable?

Why does the word 'anal-retentive' appear in virtually every posting you
ever make? Could it be you are trying to tell us something? Like YOU are
anal-retentive? Or perhaps you are just an unimaginative and predictable
jerk...

The annoying thing about K e n was that he was so predictable you could
make up his posts for him. However, the same is true of you. A lame flame,
with a little unsuccessful sarcasm, and the term 'anal-retarded' and you have
a typical 'phantom' flame.

I shall try writing a 'phantomism' now, to show everyone how easy it is:

   Oh hey, youre a silly person. in fact I would go so far as to say you're
   a jolly silly person. Indeed my view is that you probably have a small
   nob, or indeed none at all...[crap sarcasm approaches]... which must be
   so terrible for you considering how many girlies you shag...[crap sarcasm
   finishes - yes, you missed it] And I think you are not all that good a
   flamer either actually but that's just my opinion. Did I mention that
   you were predictable?

Phantom will then go on to add authourity to his flame by... wait for it...
inventing silly names for peoples initials! This way, he thrusts his greater
intellect upon us, forcing us to cower under the power of insults such as

   J.us S.tupid

Let's face it, the man is a spotty little geek somewhere in front of a computer
trying to find love in this (oh so cruel) world, failing, and therefore trying
to hurt people with his lames. He fails spectacularly.

~THE GREAT NAME
--
    Don't worry,
     Its like in the comic books...
      ITS NOT REAL!