NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3/NN_1993_3.iso/spool/alt/flame/19248

Text File | 1993-01-24 | 10.0 KB | 240 lines

Newsgroups: alt.flame
Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!faraday.clas.Virginia.EDU!jbl3g
From: [e-mail] (Jason Basinger Linkins)
Subject: Re: Girls & alt.flame
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Organization: University of Virginia
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Distribution: na
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 02:29:43 GMT
Lines: 227

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Jason Basinger Linkins) writes:
>> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>>>
>> No.  Liz, like you, is almost universally hated.  When she posts, flamers
>> from all over the net swoop down upon her and pick her pitiful missives
>> apart right in front of her.  They do the same with you.
>
>The first time that I cam to alt.flame, Liz was not here for
>a little time. There were posts asking for her. Yuo are
>WRONG.

Like the true idiot that you are, you post a response that has nothing to
do with what I have said.  Where in the above article of mine do I say,
"There were no posts on alt.flame for Liz before Michele got here"?
Nowhere.  It is you, who is once again, wrong.

>>
>>>A moron like you can't speak about proofs.
>>
>> An illiterate fuckwit like you hasn't been able to speak about anything
>> rationally.
>
>I know many flase intellectual as you that are really stupid
>(as you are). They don't use their "mind" to think, no, they
>use the minds of the writers, and then they report what
>somebody else thought.

"Flase intellectuals"?  Good try.  Remember how to form simple
one-syllable words next time.  What writers am I using?  Can you
name one?  Twice in one post, you are WRONG.
>
>That's why you say bullshit, here. You don't report anything.
>You are a moron.
>
>>Moreover, I have proved beyond all doubt, and will continue
>> to do so, that you are an utter moron.
>
>You neither know the meaning of the word "proof".

proof:  a piece of substantive material that can serve as evidence
    that something is so (Example:  The fact that you have been
    wrong twice in the post prove the claim that you are an
    "utter moron."

That's three times you are wrong.
>>
>>>No, it is a flame of yours. I used it to show you as much
>          ^^^^^^
>AH-HA! I am the loser, eh? You are humiliating me, eh?!?
>Yes, yes, yes, yes. You are so *good* THAT YOU NEED TO
>CHANGE MY POSTS! I wrote *LAME*, not flame. Everybody can
>check!

Well, okay, I changed it.  But once again, it was to correct an error of
yours.  For a fine example of a "lame", archive all of your posts.
Read them.  If you can't get your mommy to help you.  I'm sure she'll
be free after your father finishes his Monday morning rape.
>
>> No, unevolved means that somewhere you are stuck between a monkey and
>> a human being.
>
>What's the definition of human being, you?!?
Well, you see, unlike you, I walk upright on my hind legs.  I also do
not have a primitive homo erectus skull like you.  Let's see, my
opposeable thumbs, my spinal column...yep, physiologically I *am*
a human.  When you evolve, I am sure your doctor will let you know.

>You are just a broken computer, you neural network is down.
>Ask to K E N about how to fix it.

Anyone who would recommend K E N's advice is a blithering fool.  I bet
he's your ideal flamer.  Get a life.

>> Michele...if you wanted to try to drink me under the table, I'd be glad
>> to "party" you to an early grave any day of the week.
>
>OK! Tequila Cuervo the friday, Long Island Ice tea the
>saturday, Beer the sunday, Margarita the monday and Beer
>again all the other nights. Let me know.

You fucking pussy!  I'm ready to eat the worm seven days a week!  What
is this fucking sissy beer stuff?

>
>> Ha-ha!  Read some of your last postings!  You also have respect for
>> people you could not tolerate, remember?
>
>No, no, no, no, I already told you that you are wrong. I
>said that, (and you can go back to check) that I tolerate
>the people that I don't respect. I think that it is english.
You have said that you respect people you do not tolerate.  That is *exactly*
how you said it.  Archive your posts if you have any doubts.  You have also
said that you have respect for losers and assholes.  That must be so
you can possibly respect yourself.
Read your own posts.  It is all RIGHT THERE.
>>

>> They don't need me.  But since no one else is gonna do it, I will.
>
>Maybe if women did not say anything, it means that you are
>wrong, eh?
Maybe if they haven't said anything, it is because they are enjoying
the daily hell I put your stupid ass through, eh?

>> You see, Liz isn't fun.  Liz is an asshole like you.  In no way do I feel
>> inferior to Liz.  Most farm animals wouldn't feel inferior to Liz.
>
>Liz beat you constantly. You lie.
Liz, has never *beaten* me.  Liz is a stupid pig.  SHe has tried and failed.
So have you similarly tried and failed.  I can't decide which one of you
has failed more miserably.

>That explains why you are so sexist thinking that you have
>to protect women..
Ha.  That's rich.  I am far from a sexist.  The day you begin to realise
how to perceive all human beings as human beings, then you can call
someone a sexist.  I don't need to protect women!  I can just as well
stop defending women to you if you want me to.  I see what's on your
mind, you are saying "Please don't attack me anymore!  I can't take it."
Well, I'm having fun making you look like an idiot.  When any woman on
this net says, lay off of poor Michelina, then I'll lay off you.  You
better realise that the reason no one does is because everyone is enjoying
me pounding you into pastry on a daily basis.

>>also the Wahoo, a fish that can drink three times its own weight
>> (we are _quite_ the partiers here))
>
>My mascot was John Belushy...
How fitting...

>>
>> At any rate, I am not out to play Cavalier.  I am out to showcase your
>> stupidity for all to see.  And I am doing a fine job.
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>You are the only one that says that.
Find one person who agrees with you!  ONE!  Go ahead and try you poor
misguided fuckstain!  Be my fucking guest! HAHA!
>>>
>> Ha.  No way.  You should see the mistake she made today.  Complimenting
>> me when she wanted to insult me.  I would never do anything that dumb.
>
>You insult yourself when you want to compliment a woman.
Coming from someone who insults himself everytime he posts (taking pride
in your self-acclaimed "drivel" for instance) this has little affect on me.

>> I'd at least like to teach you to underline.
>>
>Idiot, it is Tab. Learn about computer. If you look at the
>original post, you see that the underline is perfect.
>Such a moron.
Oh you fool, the only thing you might know about Tab is that it is a soft
drink.  Was the underline perfect when it got to me? NOOOOOOOO! Idiot.

>> I believe that I was called the "sensitive defender of women's RIGHTS", yes.
>
>*Who* said this bullshit? Where?

Oh, don't pretend you haven't seen it, asshole!  You responded to that post!!
It said "Waittaminit!  I thought Jason was the sensitive defender of women's
rights..." and went on to ask why I yelled at Liz.  You fucking fool,
you responded to that post!  You can't now say you never saw it!  You yell
at me for changing your posts, but when you act like you never saw something
that you know you have, it makes you out to be the loser that you are.

>
>> And most women would agree that you are a pig.
>
>Women like pig, moron. Pigs have fantasy making love, not as
>you cold intellectuals.
Why am I getting laid on a regular basis and you have to rape?
Methinks the mud bath is calling you again, pig.
>>
>But fuck you, idiot! You have been flamed also to be a moron.
The people who have flamed me include Liz, Witty, Jorn, and yourself.
Maybe you two should form your own flame group "Lizzie and the Net.cretins".
The company you keep is not stellar.
>
>> ATTN:  Any woman who has ever said this to Michele, please let me know!!
>> Somehow, I know you are lying.
>
>They are too much wonderful, they don't speak with losers
>like you.

I want proof that they speak to loser like yourself.  So far, not one woman
has come forward and said, "I am a big fan of Michelina's."  Nor have I
been given proof that you have the so-called "supporters" you say you
do.

>>>
>>>You are not flaming me, idiot. You are just annoying us.
>
>> Us?  Are you schizophrenic?  Who is this us?  You aren't going to become
>> one of those mindless K E N machines, are you?
>
>It is a general feeling in alt.flame, that you are a cold,
>annoying, moron. So, I said *us*. Anyway, two is enough to
>say us, ask to Liz...

So you and Liz are suddenly the majority of alt.flame!  You and Liz now
make up the "general consensus" of alt.flame?!  Get a fucking clue.
How many people are in this newgroup?  Maybe twenty?  And you say
two people makes up the "general feeling in alt.flame"?
You are saying that because ten percent, say so, then it's true.
You prove everyday that you are a bigger moron than we originally thought.
You better learn some basic math before you flame me again.
>>
>> Oh, really?  WHy don't you run away all the same?  I'd like to see
>> everyone here on their knees, begging for you to come back!
>
>I already did, once. I had to. They all were so sorry.
HAHAHAHAHA!!! Having delusions of grandeur again.  No one is ever sorry
to see someone leave alt.flame!  We don't sit back and bemoan each others
absences.  Why don't you try leaving again?  We promise, we won't ask you
to come back.

>You have the humor of a brit.
Oh, my!  Quite a (f)lame, there, michelina!  If that puts me in the
same category as John Cleese and Michael Caine, then I thank you
for the compliment.

>> When are you nice to them, before or after you beat them??
>
>*During* that

I see, the sheep you rut with are lining up at the door to get beaten
and raped by you.  It is truly sad.