home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.feminism:7712 soc.men:23416
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism,soc.men
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!pacbell.com!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!news.ans.net!cmcl2!panix!gcf
- From: gcf@panix.com (Gordon Fitch)
- Subject: Re: Duck and Jive (was Re: Pre-Sex Contract)
- Message-ID: <C1JGLs.90o@panix.com>
- Organization: mydog in exile
- References: <727986448@lear.cs.duke.edu> <C1IsMF.8A4@panix.com> <728163383@lear.cs.duke.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:41:51 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- I'm not interested in discussing welfare at this time,
- especially when the argument is cast in the classical
- terms which demonstrate that nothing I have said has
- ever made any difference. For example,
-
- In article <728163383@lear.cs.duke.edu> gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel) writes:
- | ...
- | Welfare women have more kids per woman than middle class women.
- | ...
-
- The last statistics I saw showed that the number of
- surviving children per woman of a given income group
- is positively correlated to income. That is, rich
- women have the most children and poor women the
- fewest, in the United States, anyway. If you have
- other statistics, Hillel, please post them; otherwise
- we will be burdened by suspicions as to your respect
- for truth.
- --
-
- )*( Gordon Fitch )*( gcf@panix.com )*(
- ( 1238 Blg. Grn. Sta., NY NY 10274 * 718.273.5556 )
-