home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!spool.mu.edu!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!pipex!ibmpcug!mantis!news
- From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew)
- Newsgroups: alt.atheism
- Subject: Re: A Challenge
- Message-ID: <930127.110630.8Y4.rusnews.w165w@mantis.co.uk>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 11:06:30 GMT
- References: <C18Aus.42K@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan25.231023.26524@nmsu.edu> <C1Fqzp.HzG@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.
- Lines: 12
- X-Newsreader: rusnews v0.98
-
- cobb@alexia.lis.uiuc.edu (Mike Cobb) writes:
- > So it wouldn't be worth the effort to get opposing groups together to try to
- > set up a forum for debate?
-
- I doubt it. My experience is that Usenet is actually *better* for these
- debates than real life, because on Usenet all participants can respond
- point-by-point, can't be interrupted, and can retrieve previous sections of
- the debate for reference and quotation. And the oratory skills of the
- preacher don't help him sway the audience.
-
-
- mathew
-