home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / alt / angst / 5655 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-28  |  1.1 KB
  1. Xref: sparky alt.angst:5655 alt.slack:3975 co.general:2758
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!darwin.sura.net!bogus.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!boulder!tali.hsc.colorado.edu!tali.hsc.colorado.edu!news
  3. From: chris@tali.hsc.colorado.edu (Chris Yoder)
  4. Newsgroups: alt.angst,alt.slack,co.general
  5. Subject: Re: Politics of the Museum?
  6. Date: 28 Jan 1993 10:46:19 -0700
  7. Organization: University of Colorado, Health Sciences Center.
  8. Lines: 8
  9. Distribution: co
  10. Message-ID: <1k965bINNbrh@tali.hsc.colorado.edu>
  11. References: <1993Jan24.003238.4998@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1jtcanINN3k8@tali.hsc.colorado.edu> <1993Jan28.075021.12000@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
  12. NNTP-Posting-Host: tali.hsc.colorado.edu
  13. Summary: OK
  14. Keywords: museum amend2 (surprised?)
  15.  
  16. In article <1993Jan28.075021.12000@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> kkoller@nyx.cs.du.edu (Capt. Sarcastic) writes:
  17. >
  18. >But I do thik that things are a little weird when a museum decides it will
  19. >be active politically.
  20. >
  21.     OK, I can see why it seems wierd for a museum to get involved in
  22. politics that way, but if the Amendment would cause problems for Museum
  23. Employees, then it is kind of valid.
  24.