home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!tulane!uflorida!cybernet!news
- From: caliban@cybernet.cse.fau.edu (James)
- Newsgroups: alt.activism
- Subject: Re: Libertarians and Labor Unions
- Message-ID: <sRq2XB1w165w@cybernet.cse.fau.edu>
- Date: 27 Jan 93 17:36:39 GMT
- References: <C1Fxp3.Av5@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
- Sender: news@cybernet.cse.fau.edu
- Organization: Cybernet BBS, Boca Raton, Florida
- Lines: 55
-
- Timothy.J.Young@dartmouth.edu (Timothy J. Young) writes:
-
- > It seems that those who may need government help either now or some
- > point in the future would not be joining Libertarian ranks. I don't
- > think that's an irrational assumption. Ronald Reagan (I know he wasn't
- > a Libertarian, but he favored "small government" too) once said
- > something about everyone having the right to be a millionare. It
- > doesn't take a Rhodes Scholar to figure out
- > that the right to be a millionare means next to nothing if you're
- > struggling to get by. (I'm just a college freshman, and I managed to
- > figure that out.)
-
- According to a 1984 study by the University of Michigan,
- there is a distinct economic- and educational-class connotation
- to ideology. For example, authoritarianism predominates among
- low-income and less-educated groups, but is "insignificant"
- in higher-income and better-educated groups.
- "The strength of libertarian support is the reverse: The
- proportion of libertarian supporters decreases as income level
- increases . . . Support for libertarian ideas is directly
- related to educational attainment; people with less than a
- high school education include almost no libertarians, but
- one-third of people with college degrees or beyond are
- libertarians." (Maddox and Lilie, _Beyond Liberal and
- Conservative: Reassessing the Political Spectrum_, Washington,
- D.C.: Cato Institute, 1984.)
-
- Perhaps people become libertarians because they are rich, or
- better-educated. Perhaps not. What's the difference? After
- all, every ideology serves the interest of some group. Does
- this make it illegitimate? The important question is whether
- the ideology is right or wrong, not whose ox is being gored.
- My family is Jewish, but I oppose the Neo-Nazi movement in
- Europe not from self-interest but because, as a libertarian,
- I am committed to an ideology of tolerance and justice.
- It doesn't matter whose ox is being gored: injustice is WRONG.
-
- > The laws of the free market encourage irresponsible exploitation of the
- > environment . This is one example of what government is for ; to
- > supplement market laws with a rational framework that prevents many of
- > the problems that the market itself cannot.
-
- Libertarians are among the strongest defenders of the environment.
- After all, as the Libertarian Party platform points out,
- "Pollution of other people's property is a violation of their
- rights" -- and, as even our enemies admit, we are the strongest
- defenders of individual rights.
-
- Government environmental regulations give big business a "license
- to pollute" by setting arbitrary amounts of "acceptable" pollution
- and allocating the right to pollute according to political influence.
- Libertarians support a "zero-tolerance" policy on pollution,
- and would force these environmental criminals to either clean
- up their act or else pay for the damage done to the environment
- so that it would be repaired or otherwise compensated for.
-