home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!sgigate!sgi!cdp!NFMail!poly.math.cor!math.cornell.edu!harelb
- From: harelb@math.cornell.edu
- Newsgroups: alt.activism
- Date: 20 Jan 93 22:12 PST
- Subject: Re: "Card-Carrying Member of the ACLU"
- Sender: Notesfile to Usenet Gateway <notes@igc.apc.org>
- Message-ID: <9301210610.AA05251@poly.math.cor>
- References: <9301120601.AA23989@tba.msi.corne>
- Nf-ID: #R:9301120601.AA23989@tba.msi.corne:-1186554145:9301210610.AA05251@poly.math.cor:1759493525:000:3734
- Nf-From: math.cornell.edu!harelb Jan 20 22:12:00 1993
- Lines: 93
-
-
- From: harelb@math.cornell.edu (misc.activism.progressive co-moderator)
- Subject: "Card-Carrying Member of the ACLU" (Speech by Ira Glasser)(8)
-
- "Card-Carrying Member of the ACLU" (Speech by Ira Glasser)(8)
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- "The fact is, is that he [Bush] has said, "I am *not* a
- card-carrying member of the ACLU; I am for the people."
-
- *Which* people? *Which* people?
-
- The Japanese Americans, who were incarcerated because of their
- race?
-
- The millions of American workers, who were repressed and
- suppressed because they wanted to organize?
-
- [...]"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- ==================================================================
- Speech by Ira Glasser (ACLU national director), before the
- National Press Club, Washington, DC. October 6, 1988.
-
- [I use *'s for *strong* emphasis, and ~ for ~lighter~ emphasis]
- [also, commas are sometimes used to indicate pauses, etc.]
- ==================================================================
-
- You would *never know*, that we spend 95% of our time handling more
- voting-rights cases in the South than any other organization.
-
- You would *never know*, that spend most of our time doing more
- sex-discrimination cases than any other organization in the country.
-
- You would *never know*, that we spend the bulk of our time defending the
- free-speech rights and the religious-freedom rights, and the privacy
- rights of thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of
- ordinary Americans, whose rights are violated every day by local
- government officials and by their employers.
-
- You would never know, because he never looked at the six thousand
- cases we handle, or the hundreds of bills we lobby on, and made *any*
- kind of an attempt to accurately portray what it is that the ACLU
- does, but he did say that opposed most of it.
-
-
- [continued:]
-
-
- Now, of course, we're =used= to that kind of criticism from people
- like Jerry Falwell. And from people like Jerry Falwell all throughout
- our history. Falwell =likes= to say we're anti-Christian. Just a week
- or two ago he said, "The ACLU is anti-Christian. Christians," he said,
- pretending to speak for them, "Christians think about the ACLU the way
- Jews think about the American Nazis."
-
- Now, I expect that from Jerry Falwell, but I do *not* expect that --
- and Americans ought not to expect it -- from a candidate for the
- presidency, from a major party in this country. I do *not* expect that
- kind of nonsense to be heard from a major candidate.
-
- If he is against all of those rights, if he is in =fact= against most
- of what the ACLU does, then he is against most of the Bill of Rights,
- and he has aligned himself with the darkest forces in America, which
- from time to time arise to repress those rights.
-
- The fact is, is that he has said, "I am *not* a card-carrying member of
- the ACLU; I am for the people."
-
- *Which* people? *Which* people?
-
- The Japanese Americans, who were incarcerated because of their race?
-
- The millions of American workers, who were repressed and suppressed
- because they wanted to organize?
-
- The Blacks, and other people of color in this society, who for so long
- suffered, and suffer still, from discrimination?
-
- *Fifty* percent of our population, women, who were relegated to
- second-class citizenship for so long?
-
- The hundreds of thousands of ordinary citizens who are chewed up by
- countless public officials every day in this society, and whose only
- recourse is the ACLU?
-
- *Which* people? *Which* people is he for? -- if he's =for= *those*
- people, then he is for the ACLU; and if he is against those people, it
- is he, and not we, who are out of the mainstream.
-
-
-
-