home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / vmsnet / mail / pmdf / 2816 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-02  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!crcnis1.unl.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!mccall!ipmdf-newsgate!list
  2. Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.pmdf
  3. Subject: RE: mailserv `unauthorized' rejection msgs
  4. Message-ID: <01GT0S9PZ9SE8ZE46M@camb.com>
  5. From: Bob Tinkelman <bob@camb.com>
  6. Date: 01 Jan 1993 23:01:15 -0400 (EDT)
  7. Organization: Cambridge Computer Associates, Inc.
  8. Return-Path: <epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU>
  9. Resent-Date: 01 Jan 1993 23:01:15 -0400 (EDT)
  10. Resent-From: epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU
  11. Errors-To: epmdf@YMIR.CLAREMONT.EDU
  12. Resent-Message-ID: <01GT0M0GOCGI8WVYXF@INNOSOFT.COM>
  13. X-Vms-To: IN%INFO-PMDF
  14. X-Vms-Cc: TINKELMAN
  15. Mime-Version: 1.0
  16. Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
  17. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
  18. Lines: 11
  19.  
  20. > You'll have to strip the subaddresses from the actual authorization list
  21. > entries or arrange it so users use the proper subaddress when submitting
  22. > to the list.
  23.  
  24. What do you think of offering an option to allow
  25.     Sender: bob@camb.com
  26. to match an authorization list entry of the form
  27.     bob+subaddress@camb.com
  28.  
  29. If such an option were available, I think I'd use it.  Does it imply
  30. some sort of hole in the security of authorizations?
  31.