home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / talk / origins / 15870 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-22  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!tdat!tools3!swf
  2. From: swf@tools3teradata.com (Stan Friesen)
  3. Newsgroups: talk.origins
  4. Subject: Re: A Response to the Flood FAQ
  5. Message-ID: <1655@tdat.teradata.COM>
  6. Date: 22 Dec 92 18:02:13 GMT
  7. References: <7973@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM> <1992Dec16.141835.20281@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>
  8. Sender: news@tdat.teradata.COM
  9. Distribution: world
  10. Organization: NCR Teradata Database Business Unit
  11. Lines: 16
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Dec16.141835.20281@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>, jgacker@news.gsfc.nasa.gov (James G. Acker) writes:
  14. |>     The lesson is this:  if a global Noachian flood did actually
  15. |> cause all present-day geological formations, it COULD
  16. |> be proven scientifically.
  17.  
  18. Not only that, but 150 years ago there were several major geologists who were
  19. attempting *just* *that*.  In fact the glacial deposits of northern Europe were
  20. originally interpreted as Noachian.
  21.  
  22. What happened?  They totally failed to find *any* evidence confirming the flood
  23. that stood up to close examination.  That is why it is rejected today.
  24.  
  25. -- 
  26. sarima@teradata.com            (formerly tdatirv!sarima)
  27.   or
  28. Stanley.Friesen@ElSegundoCA.ncr.com
  29.