home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!co940
- From: co940@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Nicholas E. Damato)
- Newsgroups: talk.environment
- Subject: Re: Plutinium poisoning: Was Re: Greenpeace: they're not just for...
- Date: 21 Dec 1992 08:44:03 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <1h404jINNhti@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hela.ins.cwru.edu
-
-
- caw, caw,
- If your numbers are correct, and i have no reason to suspect
- otherwise i am pathetically wrong and apologize profusely to
- the readers.
-
- BTW i thought i canceled this message, how did you find it?
-
- my numbers for plutonium were somewhere down near your
- polonium numbers. in fact i was going to go look up the
- exact numbers of plutonium, polonium, dioxin, aflatoxin
- and a few more perennial favorits and post them here
- monday eve. I'll still look them up and if i'm right
- i'll post'em if not i'll leave you to stand as the authority.
-
- my measure was the TLV/TWA for airborn Pu and OHSA's
- "never exceed" limits.
- maybe in my addled brain i reversed Pu and Po from my
- Haz-mat studied of years past, i don't know. and for the
- record i intended to have the numbers when i mailed you,
- i never intended to mail that article, that's why i cancelled.
-
- until another post meets another flame, adios...
- ned.
-