home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 53989 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-03  |  1.3 KB  |  26 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!The-Village!waterbed
  3. From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
  4. Subject: Re: Clarifying "Restrictions"
  5. Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
  6. Message-ID: <1993Jan04.022253.2280@watson.ibm.com>
  7. Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 02:22:53 GMT
  8. News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.16f by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
  9. Lines: 10
  10. Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
  11. Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
  12. References: <1993Jan02.035011.4843@watson.ibm.com> <1993Jan2.224341.9574@rotag.mi.org> <1993Jan03.012811.21437@watson.ibm.com> <1993Jan3.194606.2536@netcom.com>
  13. Nntp-Posting-Host: netslip63.watson.ibm.com
  14. Organization: The Village Waterbed
  15.  
  16. In <1993Jan3.194606.2536@netcom.com> ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
  17. >I should like to point out that almost nobody seriously proposes that
  18. >there should be no restrictions whatever on the process of getting an
  19. >abortion.
  20.  
  21. True, but many people *do* seriously argue that there should be no restrictions
  22. beyond those associated with any other medical procedure.  I believe that's
  23. generally abbreviated to "no restrictions" in discussion here.
  24. --
  25. Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
  26.