NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/talk/abortion/53986

Internet Message Format | 1993-01-03 | 5.7 KB

Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53986 alt.flame:17568 alt.fan.kevin-darcy:680
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame,alt.fan.kevin-darcy
Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!kcochran
From: [e-mail] (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran)
Subject: Re: Clarifying "Restrictions"
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Summary: Or, "Darcy Does Himself In Once Again...
X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
    of Denver for the Denver community.  The University has neither
    control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
Keywords: You expect me to mark my deletions?  Dream on...
Sender: [e-mail] (netnews admin account)
Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 93 02:02:23 GMT
Lines: 115

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran) writes:
>>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Kevin Darcy) writes:
>>>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
>>>>
>>>>Kebbin is just mad because we live in the Real World (tm) and not in
>>>>some Darcian fantasy in which it is more dangerous to terminate a
>>>>pregnancy then to carry the fetus to term.
>>>
>>>Learn the difference between a hypothetical question and a fantasy, ignoramus.
>>
>>"Kevin Darcy is a genius".  Hypothetical question or fantasy?  You be the
>>judge.
>
>It's not even a question, so how can it be a hypothetical question?

Learn how quotes[sic] and periods[sic] are used in the American language,
ignoramus.

>
>Whatever the "judgment" is whether I'm a genius, I think it's pretty obvious
>whether or NOT! you're one...

Well, I'm "Justified And Ancient".  I make no claims to being a net.genius,
unlike some....

>
>>>>Considering his tendancy to
>>>>argue both sides of any given question, I'd say he is the one who
>>>>needs to be concerned with moral inconsistancy.
>>>
>>>Arguing a position and believing it aren't necessarily the same thing, schmuck.
>>
>>You know, Kevin, I'm beginning to believe that you're a Cochran-phobe.
>
>You know, Keith, this is one of the stupidest things I've ever read on the
>Net. Your blood relationship with the other moron has nothing to do with my
>penchant for refuting the arguments of weak-minded sophists everywhere.

You hae a penhant[sic] for refuting[sic] arguments[sic]?  Was I asleep when
this happened?

>
>I'll also note that, not once, in all the long battles my brother and I
>waged in alt.flame, and all of the times we had a common enemy, did either of
>us ever accuse anyone of being a "Darcy-phobe".

Ah, so that idocy that you spewed onto the net for months claiming that I was
a homophobe was just hot air...

>
>But then, we never got as close to desperate as you apparently have, either...

Like claiming that a victim of sexual child abuse was a child molester?

>
>>Granted, the only "proof" I have of this is your
>>posts, and posting style, but I think that speaks plainly enough for everybody
>>to see.
>
>Yeah, it speaks plainly, all right -- it means you just made this horseshit
>up out of thin air.

Please refer to any post made by Kevin Darcy for a defintion of "horseshit".

>
>>>>I'm still waiting for your real life example to validate your question
>>>>Kebbin...
>>>
>>>Can you guarantee me that there is no possible or foreseeable combination of
>>>medical factors which could make termination of pregnancy more dangerous
>>>than carrying to term? Are you willing to put whatever medical credentials
>>>you possess on the line over this question? I _do_ have some contacts at
>>>the UofM Medical Center (largest medical complex in the world, perhaps
>>>you've heard of it?), which is a couple of miles down the road from me.
>>>I _can_ check this out, if necessary, and if you've been propagating bogus
>>>medical information on the Net... well...
>>
>>Kebbin brags, evades the question, and then makes yet another veiled threat
>>against a person named Cochran.
>
>Brags? Threatens? What an active imagination you have there, Keith

"I _do_ have some contacts..."  "I _can_ check this out..."  "...and if you've
been propaating bogus medical information on the Net... well..."

Gee, does that hat taste good, Kevin?

>Whatsyername. I was just letting Mark Whatshisname know that he couldn't just
>blabber medical half-facts and non-facts, and expect them to go unchecked.
>
>>This is turning into your "it's not legal in every state to use lethal force
>>to stop a rape" thing, isn't it?  Why don't you stop waffling, and just
>>give us a situation (hypothetical or not) where ending a pregnancy is more
>>dangerous to the woman than continuing it?
>
>A 28-week pregnant woman, without any discernible medical complications,
>announces her wish to end her pregnancy by having her fetus sucked out through
>her spine, heart and cerebellum. Should she be allowed to abort in this
>manner?

Kindly provide the name of any medical doctor qualified to perform abortions
who would perform an abortion in this manner under any circumstance, and I'll
get back to you...


>
>Hey, you said "hypothetical or not"...

Mark (and myself) didn't say "Completly Ludircous"...
--
=[e-mail] | B(0-4) c- d- e++ f- g++ k(+) m r(-) s++(+) t | TSAKC=
=My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza.  OK???=
="I could have missed the pain, but I'd have had to miss...
=the dance"-Garth Brooks