home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!gordons
- From: gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga)
- Subject: Re: Susan smears Holtsinger unjustly
- Message-ID: <1993Jan3.055618.24249@netcom.com>
- Organization: Gizmonic Institute - Home of the "Big G Burger"
- References: <nyikos.725573716@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <1992Dec30.005219.9201@netcom.com> <1993Jan2.094941.7852@rotag.mi.org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 05:56:18 GMT
- Lines: 70
-
- <1993Jan2.094941.7852@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- ><1992Dec30.005219.9201@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) writes:
- >><nyikos.725573716@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
- >>><1157@blue.cis.pitt.edu> sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin) writes:
- >>>...showing absolutely *no* shame about quoting things out of context:
- >>>>In article <1992Dec24.023729.15109@ncsu.edu> dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu
- ...
- >>Susan has proved to be one of the few people who are generally logical and
- >>well-thought out in her responses and statements.
- >
- >Are we talking about the same "Susan", Gordon?
-
- I don't know. I was talking about Susan Garvin. Who were you talking
- about?
-
- >>That coupled with the
- >>fact that she isn't trying to get laws passed that oppress people makes
- >>her much easier to believe.
- >
- >Ideological bias. Ptui. I'll try to forget that I read that...
-
- Shouldn't be too difficult for you...
-
- >>Although she has been known to get after some people a little too much it's
- >>no big deal.
- >
- >To you, as a more-or-less-neutral bystander of this "getting after", it may
- >not seem like a "big deal", Galen. It can seem otherwise from a different
- ^^^^^
- See, I told you it wouldn't be too difficult for you.
-
- >vantage point, though, believe me...
-
- I'm sure it can.
-
- >>If Susan was to post something that conflicted with my experience of
- >>knowledge I would correct her. She hasn't as far as I'm aware.
- >
- >Here's an example from the top of a long list, Galen: do you "know" that
- ^^^^^
- There you go again. Try not to forget too much, ok?
-
- >Kevin Darcy been arguing for restrictions on abortion? See .sig.
- >
- >UNRETRACTED LIE
- >---------------
- >
- >"Darcy has been consistently criticized for labelling
- > himself 'pro-choice' while arguing for restrictions on abortion."
- > Susie Garvin
- > Sun, 18 Oct 92 20:37:06 GMT
- > <1992Oct18.203706.21850@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
-
- Perhaps I should clarify something. I don't read all the posts in this
- newsgroup. And I'm not going to go out of my way to research everything
- Susan might have said. I have no evidence or experience to contradict
- your quote of SG. Since you have disputed it then at least someone with
- more info than myself has spoken up. I feel no need in this case to join
- the fray.
-
-
- G-O-R-D-O-N
- Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
- Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), Diana (Sorceress), Beth
- "CJ", and Nadja, and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it.
- [space reserved for alternate ex-girlfriends Eric R. and Drieux]
- --
- The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
- of whatever company you think I work for. So there, thhhbbbt!
- Message to Kodak: Freedom for Dan Bredy.
-