home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!The-Village!waterbed
- From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
- Subject: Re: Pro-choicers must condone infanticide
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan02.045752.4968@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 04:57:52 GMT
- News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.16f by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
- Lines: 17
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- References: <1992Dec29.111932.26271@hemlock.cray.com> <1992Dec30.005736.24210@rotag.mi.org> <1992Dec30.051334.12145@watson.ibm.com> <1993Jan1.022332.536@rotag.mi.org>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: netslip63.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: The Village Waterbed
-
- In <1993Jan1.022332.536@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >In article <1992Dec30.051334.12145@watson.ibm.com> margoli@watson.IBM.com writes:
- >>In <1992Dec30.005736.24210@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >>>
- >>>"Interference" refers to detrimental effects. It is not a violation
- >>>of BA to have one's biological functions affected in beneficial ways.
- >>
- >>Someone whose religious beliefs forbid medical intervention might not agree...
- >
- >True, but in the context of the article from which you quoted, "beneficial
- >ways" mostly denoted natural gestational processes.
-
- First you said "The word "autonomy", by itself, implies freedom from outside
- interference." Then, in the article I quoted, you attempted to restrict
- "interference" to detrimental effects. Interference is interference.
- --
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-