home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!galen.med.Virginia.EDU!gjh
- From: gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis)
- Subject: Re: Slavery Analogy
- Message-ID: <1992Dec30.195747.16898@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
- References: <1992Dec29.225414.26768@csrd.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec30.170931.5650@wdl.loral.com> <1992Dec30.183353.16725@csrd.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 19:57:47 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1992Dec30.183353.16725@csrd.uiuc.edu> g-skinner@uiuc.edu
- writes that we can draw valid conclusions about the legality of
- abortion from looking at slavery:
-
- }If one wants one's argument to be compelling, the connection is best
- }not left to the reader. If it is, however, and the reader doesn't
- }make the connection, the proper response is to make the connection
- }explicit. An improper response would be to flame the reader for not
- }making the connnection.
-
- Oh, in other words, we should first allow states to ban abortion only
- in those territories in rebellion.
-
- Is that a proper response? If I (the reader) did not make a proper
- connection, would you please show the connection, not just simply assert
- it?
-
- --
- hang gliding mailing list: hang-gliding-request@virginia.edu
- Galen Hekhuis UVa Health Sci Ctr (804)982-1646 gjh@virginia.edu
- Illiterate? Write for FREE help...
-