home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!news
- From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
- Subject: Re: Clarifying "Restrictions"
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec30.000557.20083@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 00:05:57 GMT
- News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.16f by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
- Lines: 10
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- References: <1992Dec28.020955.13604@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Dec28.190837.4545@watson.ibm.com> <1992Dec29.205111.8857@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Dec29.223707.23551@rotag.mi.org>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: margoli.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
-
- In <1992Dec29.223707.23551@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >
- >I do not argue "in favor of" abortion restrictions, Mark. That would imply
- >that I preferred their existence over their non-existence. I do not.
-
- Well, how would you phrase it? Would it be fair to say that you're arguing
- on the behalf of abortion restrictions? (Or on the behalf of those who
- support restrictions, if you prefer.)
- --
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-