home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:53232 alt.society.civil-liberty:7091 talk.politics.misc:65451
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu!pitt.edu!sgast
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.society.civil-liberty,talk.politics.misc
- Subject: Re: Is Fire Bombing a Legitimate Form of Free Speach.
- Message-ID: <1201@blue.cis.pitt.edu>
- From: sgast+@pitt.edu (Susan Garvin)
- Date: 28 Dec 92 20:53:30 GMT
- Sender: news+@pitt.edu
- Followup-To: talk.abortion
- References: <1992Dec26.212139.9327@ncsu.edu> <1992Dec28.013646.17778@wetware.com> <1992Dec28.052048.18650@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Organization: University of Pittsburgh
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Dec28.052048.18650@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> clavazzi@nux.cs.du.edu (The_Doge) writes:
- [everything else deleted]
- # In my book, "civil disobedience" consists of passively refusing to
- #cooperate with laws one regards as unjust. It does not include death threats,
- #bombs, and assault.
-
- That's one of the problems that I have with O.R. (and with some other
- groups) calling what they do civil disobedience. Unless O.R. is
- protesting trespass laws, I don't consider what they're doing C.D.
- I think the phrase has changed in meaning these days - people
- say they're going to do C.D. when what they mean is they're
- going to get arrested for protesting.
-
-
- Susan
-